Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???
From: Richard (riplin_at_Azonic.co.nz)
Date: 01/07/04
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4"
- Previous message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4"
- In reply to: Francis ANDRE: "[Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 6 Jan 2004 15:52:35 -0800
"Francis ANDRE" <francis.andre@easynet.fr> wrote
> I made some research on the net to find out how many lines of cobol were
> running in today's production systems, but I could not find out a strong
> validated and (why not audited) figure.
'Audited' ? No one has ever even asked me for a guess of how many
lines are running in production systems that I have written, or even
knows to ask.
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4"
- Previous message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4"
- In reply to: Francis ANDRE: "[Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]