Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO
From: Doug Scott (dwscott_at_ieee.org)
Date: 01/07/04
- Next message: William M. Klein: "Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4"
- Previous message: Thane Hubbell: "Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 20:30:07 GMT
Richard,
> I have no doubt that Sybase/SQLServer is a full featured product, but
> the presenter probably came from a PC/Access background rather that
> from the corporate server end of the market.
>
:-)
And certainly not from production support!
--- Doug dwscott@ieee.org
- Next message: William M. Klein: "Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4"
- Previous message: Thane Hubbell: "Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]