Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question
From: Joe Zitzelberger (joe_zitzelberger_at_nospam.com)
Date: 01/17/04
- Previous message: Judson McClendon: "Re: Standards question on edited fields"
- In reply to: SkippyPB: "Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question"
- Next in thread: Alistair Maclean: "Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:14:43 -0500
In article <9i7g0097ts0rdua0t8c3anh1eb4f5dttfm@4ax.com>,
SkippyPB <swiegand@neo.rr.NOSPAM.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:16:12 +0000, Alistair Maclean
> <alistair@ld50macca.demon.co.uk> enlightened us:
>
> >I may be missing the obvious but why don't you add a field to the
> >COMMAREA to tell the program how it has been called/executed?
> >
>
> It is a matter of how the data is retrieved. If the program is called
> or linked to, there is indeed a COMMAREA passed to it. However, if MQ
> invokes the program, the data stream must be RETRIEVED into an area.
> That is why the program would need to know how it was invoked.
>
>
E. C. Assign StartCode will tell you that -- the MQ invocation will be
"SD" -- the link with commarea would be something I would need to check
the manual for 'TD' or 'T '? Can't remember...
- Previous message: Judson McClendon: "Re: Standards question on edited fields"
- In reply to: SkippyPB: "Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question"
- Next in thread: Alistair Maclean: "Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
