comp.lang.cobol
By Author

781 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 12/31/03
Ending: 01/31/04

• =D=
  • Re: Future of programming (01/29/04)
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/29/04)
  • OT: reptiles and kittys WAS: Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/23/04)
• Abby the Tabby
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/27/04)
  • The Computer Merchant LTD (01/26/04)
• Adam Russell
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
• AHoudini
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/21/04)
• Alain Reymond
  • Re: Postal code what "Picture" (01/28/04)
  • Re: Postal code what "Picture" (01/28/04)
• Alan Sung
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/28/04)
• Alistair Maclean
  • Re: I'm buying sources of small Cobol applications (01/27/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/20/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/16/04)
  • OT - Bugs in software [1/1] (01/15/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/15/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/15/04)
• Andr? Queiroz
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/22/04)
  • How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/21/04)
  • CICS START command (01/02/04)
• Andy
  • Re: Micro Focus Cobol and Web Services Question (01/28/04)
  • Micro Focus Cobol and Web Services Question (01/27/04)
• Anthony Dilworth
  • OT - Bugs in software (01/15/04)
• Arnold Trembley
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: CICS START command (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/01/04)
• ben
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/21/04)
• BigMarwin
  • Call DLL from Screenset (01/19/04)
• Billy O'Connor
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/26/04)
  • Re: MVS Retraining (01/16/04)
  • Re: MVS Retraining (01/12/04)
• Bob
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/15/04)
  • Size of ISAM file (01/15/04)
  • Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/09/04)
• Bob Wolfe
  • Re: Crystal Reports (01/28/04)
  • Micro Focus Developer Forum (01/26/04)
  • Re: COBOL (01/19/04)
  • Re: Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/05/04)
• Bounder
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/21/04)
• Bradley K. Sherman
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/01/04)
• Carey Gregory
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/26/04)
• Charl Freysen
  • Re: ACCEPT - Stupid question (01/26/04)
  • Re: ACCEPT - Stupid question (01/24/04)
  • ACCEPT - Stupid question (01/24/04)
• Charles Hottel
  • COBOL Related News (01/23/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/15/04)
• Charles Richmond
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/02/04)
• Chris Collins
  • Filesharing (01/26/04)
• Chuck Stevens
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/20/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/19/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/07/04)
  • Re: COBOL Standards Issue (01/05/04)
• Clark F. Morris, Jr.
  • [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/26/04)
  • Future of programming (01/26/04)
  • Call prototype vs Invoke was Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/18/04)
• Colin Campbell
  • IBM Mainframe JCL Conversion Tools (01/30/04)
  • Re: For shame! Using OS/VS COBOL 90 years before it went off support! (01/19/04)
  • For shame! Using OS/VS COBOL 90 years before it went off support! (01/17/04)
  • Re: Object + Source (01/07/04)
• Curtis Bass
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/29/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/29/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/28/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/28/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/28/04)
• d.castignone_at_axenta.com
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/19/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/19/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/19/04)
  • PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/18/04)
• Daniel Klopfer
  • Re: Umwandel Hex 'C1' to BLANK mit cobol. (01/17/04)
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/15/04)
  • Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/14/04)
• DaveW
  • Fujitsu Linker (01/14/04)
• Dionisis Vrionis
  • Re: PowerCobol and Dbaccess (01/20/04)
  • PowerCobol and Dbaccess (01/20/04)
  • PowerCobol and Access (01/20/04)
  • Powercobol and sql (01/20/04)
• docdwarf_at_panix.com
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/31/04)
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/28/04)
  • [OT] Mr Bass, An Email, Please? (01/28/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/28/04)
  • Re: Postal code what "Picture" (01/27/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/26/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/23/04)
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/23/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/23/04)
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/22/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/22/04)
  • Re: For shame! Using OS/VS COBOL 90 years before it went off support! (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: IGYLI0090-W 3 sequence errors were found in this program. (01/13/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/09/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/06/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/06/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/05/04)
  • Re: General Brock monument (Re: Y2K4 with XP) (01/04/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/04/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/04/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/04/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/02/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/02/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/01/04)
• Donald Tees
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (01/14/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/09/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/08/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/07/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: Novice Question About Console I/O (01/07/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: Novice Question About Console I/O (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (12/31/03)
• Doug Scott
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/08/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/08/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/08/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/07/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
• E P Chandler
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
• Easton Beymer
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/11/04)
• Ed Guy
  • Re: utility needed to look inside a .mas file (01/16/04)
• EskWIRED_at_spamblock.panix.com
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/29/04)
• Euromercante
  • Re: Crystal Reports (01/28/04)
  • Crystal Reports (01/27/04)
  • I'm buying sources of small Cobol applications (01/27/04)
• Flavius Vespasianus
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/28/04)
• Francis ANDRE
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/09/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/08/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/06/04)
• Frederico Fonseca
  • Re: Crystal Reports (01/28/04)
  • Re: Crystal Reports (01/27/04)
  • Re: ACCEPT - Stupid question (01/24/04)
  • Re: ACCEPT - Stupid question (01/24/04)
  • Re: utility needed to look inside a .mas file (01/16/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/11/04)
• Gary
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
• ghobbs_at_sympatico.ca
  • just a test (01/04/04)
• Grinder
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/20/04)
• Gunnar Opheim
  • Re: COBOL Standards Issue (01/03/04)
• Habitant
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/30/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/30/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/30/04)
  • Riemann' Hypothesis and the Million $ price (01/29/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mr Bass, An Email, Please? (01/29/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/29/04)
  • Is Wall Street been hacked..... (01/29/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/28/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/28/04)
  • A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/28/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/28/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/28/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/28/04)
  • Raining virus! (01/27/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Lullaby for coders! (01/24/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/24/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Humor (01/23/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/23/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/21/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/21/04)
  • Red faces about Mars? (01/20/04)
  • WTC7 pulled? (01/20/04)
  • On-line project management! (01/18/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/18/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: Don't get zapped on the Net! (01/17/04)
  • Re: *Yawn* (01/17/04)
  • Re: Don't get zapped on the Net! (01/16/04)
  • Re: *Yawn* (01/16/04)
  • Hymns and hit lists! (01/15/04)
  • Mars's gigantic golf ball! (01/14/04)
  • Don't get zapped on the Net! (01/13/04)
  • The Tower of Babel (01/13/04)
  • The McCurtain Daily Gazette... (01/11/04)
  • Re: General Brock monument (Re: Y2K4 with XP) (01/11/04)
  • Coders and future archeological digs! (01/08/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
  • Backroom systems and bad math (01/08/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/06/04)
  • (OT) Swiss' Lips pissed! (01/06/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/06/04)
  • (OT) Showdown in Texas (01/06/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/06/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/05/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/04/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/04/04)
  • General Brock monument (Re: Y2K4 with XP) (01/04/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/04/04)
  • Y2K4 with XP (01/04/04)
  • Paging Mr Beckner! (01/04/04)
  • The King o' England's Sad Realm (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • (OT) Visitors? (01/01/04)
• Henk
  • File size / record count (01/31/04)
• Howard Brazee
  • Re: Market driven vs Standards (was: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/23/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/22/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/20/04)
  • Re: New Cobol IDE (01/20/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/08/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/07/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/07/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/05/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/05/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/05/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: COBOL Standards Issue (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/02/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/02/04)
• Howard Hess
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/27/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/14/04)
• hpy_awad_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: What is the best book (01/04/04)
  • Re: What is the best book (01/01/04)
• Hugh Candlin
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • OO? Oh oh! (01/27/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive wasRe: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/23/04)
  • Re: New Cobol IDE (01/21/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: Object + Source (01/07/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/02/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/02/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/02/04)
• Ian Dalziel
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/06/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/06/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/05/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/04/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
• Jack Sleight
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/30/04)
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/30/04)
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/18/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/15/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
• James J. Gavan
  • Re: Postal code what "Picture" (01/27/04)
  • Re: reports - control footing ... (01/25/04)
  • Re: ACCEPT - Stupid question (01/24/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
• Jarek B.
  • Re: Indexed Sequental file - junk when created... (01/08/04)
• jd
  • utility needed to look inside a .mas file (01/16/04)
• Jeff
  • Object + Source (01/07/04)
• JerryMouse
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/31/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/28/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/28/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/27/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Re: Future of programming (01/26/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/24/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/21/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/21/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/20/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/19/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/19/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/18/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/18/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/15/04)
  • Re: Size of ISAM file (01/15/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/13/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/10/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/09/04)
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/09/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/09/04)
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/09/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/08/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/07/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/06/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/04/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/04/04)
  • Outsourcing (01/01/04)
• Joe Zitzelberger
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/17/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/15/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/14/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/14/04)
  • Re: MVS Retraining (01/12/04)
  • Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/12/04)
  • Re: COBOL Standards Issue (01/03/04)
  • Re: COBOL Standards Issue (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
• Joern
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/31/04)
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/30/04)
  • Performance in perform loops (01/28/04)
• john
  • Re: danke fuer die Tips und neue Frage .... (01/23/04)
  • danke fuer die Tips und neue Frage .... (01/20/04)
  • Umwandel Hex 'C1' to BLANK mit cobol. (01/17/04)
• John S. Giltner, Jr.
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/28/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
• Jon Scally
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/16/04)
• Joseph Katnic
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/02/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/02/04)
• Judson McClendon
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/20/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/19/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/08/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/08/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/08/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/07/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/05/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/05/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/05/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: What is the best book (01/01/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: Date manipulation (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (12/31/03)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (12/31/03)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (12/31/03)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (12/31/03)
• Jvl
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/22/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/21/04)
• Karl Kiesel
  • Re: danke fuer die Tips und neue Frage .... (01/21/04)
  • Re: Umwandel Hex 'C1' to BLANK mit cobol. (01/19/04)
• KELLIE FITTON
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • can cobol handle the handle? (01/05/04)
• Kevin Hansen
  • Announcement: GUI ScreenIO Client/Server Layer (01/06/04)
• Leo
  • IGYLI0090-W 3 sequence errors were found in this program. (01/13/04)
• Lueko Willms
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
• LukyLuke
  • VERY DIFFICULT ??? Estabilish session from cobol or assembler program (CICS environment) to TPX (cics -> tpx)!!! Is possible? (01/13/04)
• LX-i
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/29/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/27/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/19/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/19/04)
  • Re: COBOL (01/17/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: COBOL (01/17/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/17/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/09/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/09/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/06/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/06/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/04/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/04/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/04/04)
• Michael Mattias
  • Re: IBM Mainframe JCL Conversion Tools (01/31/04)
  • Re: A short resume of Arabian history..... (01/28/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/24/04)
  • Re: PowerCobol and Dbaccess (01/20/04)
  • Re: Size of ISAM file (01/16/04)
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/09/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/05/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/02/04)
  • Re: cobol file sort (01/01/04)
• Michael Wojcik
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive wasRe: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/28/04)
• Mike
  • Re: *Yawn* (01/16/04)
  • Re: Hymns and hit lists! (01/15/04)
  • Re: Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/14/04)
  • Re: Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/10/04)
• Mike [remove \(SPAM-BLOCKER\) from my email address to reply]
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/26/04)
• mircea
  • Re: danke fuer die Tips und neue Frage .... (01/22/04)
• Nagaraj Reddy
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/09/04)
• Peter E.C. Dashwood
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: Market driven vs Standards (was: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/28/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/27/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant???]] (01/27/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/24/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/22/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/22/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/22/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/21/04)
  • Re: Short notice: COBOL / Unicode / XML course in Denver (01/21/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/21/04)
  • Re: Humor (01/21/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/21/04)
  • Re: Powercobol and sql (01/20/04)
  • Re: PowerCobol and Access (01/20/04)
  • Using Telephony from COBOL (01/18/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/18/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (01/17/04)
  • Re: Don't get zapped on the Net! (01/17/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Don't get zapped on the Net! (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/16/04)
  • Re: Size of ISAM file (01/16/04)
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/14/04)
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/14/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/13/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/10/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/10/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/10/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/07/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/06/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
• Peter Lacey
  • Re: Riemann' Hypothesis and the Million $ price (01/30/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
• Pierra
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/08/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/06/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
• q_at_q.com
  • Re: The Computer Merchant LTD (01/26/04)
• R. Hendriks
  • NetCOBOL and reports (01/05/04)
• RH
  • Re: Future of programming (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/03/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/02/04)
• Rich Chilausky
  • Re: Novice Question About Console I/O (01/09/04)
  • Re: Novice Question About Console I/O (01/07/04)
  • Novice Question About Console I/O (01/02/04)
• Richard
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/31/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/30/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/28/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/27/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/24/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/23/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/22/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/22/04)
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/22/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/21/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/21/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/19/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/19/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/15/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/14/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: Fujitsu Linker (01/14/04)
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/10/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/09/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/09/04)
  • Re: Novice Question About Console I/O (01/09/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/09/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/09/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/08/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/08/04)
  • Re: Novice Question About Console I/O (01/08/04)
  • Re: Novice Question About Console I/O (01/07/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/07/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/07/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/06/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/06/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/05/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/05/04)
  • Re: Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/04/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/03/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • Re: What is the best book (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
• ritchie
  • Re: reports - control footing ... (01/28/04)
  • Re: reports - control footing ... (01/26/04)
  • reports - control footing ... (01/25/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/23/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/22/04)
  • REWRITE query (01/20/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/08/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/06/04)
  • multiple file reads and sorts (01/05/04)
  • cobol file sort (01/01/04)
• RKRayhawk
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/17/04)
  • Re: COBOL Standards Issue (01/16/04)
  • Re: COBOL Standards Issue (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
• robert
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/18/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/17/04)
  • how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/16/04)
• Robert Jones
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/30/04)
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/28/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/23/04)
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/21/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/21/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: MVS Retraining (01/14/04)
  • Re: MVS Retraining (01/12/04)
  • Re: MVS Retraining (01/12/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/09/04)
• Robert Wessel
  • Re: CICS START command (01/02/04)
• Ron
  • Re: IBM Mainframe JCL Conversion Tools (01/31/04)
  • Re: For shame! Using OS/VS COBOL 90 years before it went off support! (01/17/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/17/04)
• Rosa Fischer
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/16/04)
• Russell Styles
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/10/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/09/04)
• S Comstock
  • Re: How to EXEC PROC in a JCL (01/21/04)
  • Short notice: COBOL / Unicode / XML course in Denver (01/21/04)
  • Ad: DB2 courses (01/08/04)
• sammy_lb_2000
  • Linking a character-base cobol program... (01/07/04)
• SANFACE Software
  • Shareware: txt2pdf 7.1 (01/21/04)
• Sergey Grigorchuk
  • Re: New Cobol IDE (01/21/04)
  • New Cobol IDE (01/20/04)
• shimon kochavi
  • COBOL Analyst Programmer Seeks Work - Miami, FL (01/22/04)
• Simon Tobias
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/09/04)
• SkippyPB
  • Re: utility needed to look inside a .mas file (01/16/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/16/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/15/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/15/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/14/04)
  • Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/13/04)
  • Re: IGYLI0090-W 3 sequence errors were found in this program. (01/13/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/04/04)
  • Re: CICS START command (01/03/04)
• Stephan
  • Postal code what "Picture" (01/27/04)
• Stephen Plotnick
  • Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/04/04)
• Steve Schooler
  • Re: MVS Retraining (01/15/04)
  • MVS Retraining (01/12/04)
• Thane Hubbell
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/28/04)
  • Re: Filesharing (01/27/04)
  • Re: Call DLL from Screenset (01/20/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/20/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/19/04)
  • Re: Call prototype vs Invoke was Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/19/04)
  • Re: COBOL (01/16/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/16/04)
  • Re: Accessing MS-SQL Server from within ACU-Cobol (01/15/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/15/04)
  • Re: Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/15/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/14/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/14/04)
  • Re: Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/13/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/13/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/09/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/08/04)
  • Re: [Q]: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: can cobol handle the handle? (01/06/04)
  • Re: Hand Held Windows PC and COBOL (01/05/04)
  • Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner" (01/01/04)
• The Family
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/31/04)
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: COBOL Related News (01/24/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/17/04)
• The World Wide Wade
  • Re: *Yawn* (01/16/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/08/04)
• Thomas A. Li
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/18/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/13/04)
• Tony Morris
  • Re: COBOL (01/17/04)
  • COBOL (01/16/04)
• Vaclav Snajdr
  • Re: Micro Focus Cobol and Web Services Question (01/28/04)
• verizon
  • Merant NetExpress & ObjectCobol for sale (01/20/04)
• Vik Mehta
  • Encryption algorithm (01/07/04)
• Warren Simmons
  • Re: Focus User Manual, Release 4.5 by Information Builders Inc. - Vendo (01/24/04)
• Wiggy
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/13/04)
• William Bub
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/10/04)
  • Re: Encryption algorithm (01/10/04)
• William M. Klein
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/30/04)
  • Market driven vs Standards (was: OO? Oh oh! (01/29/04)
  • Re: Performance in perform loops (01/28/04)
  • Re: reports - control footing ... (01/28/04)
  • Re: reports - control footing ... (01/25/04)
  • COBOL FAQ (01/25/04)
  • (Standard) COBOL and XML - Document available for review (01/23/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/21/04)
  • OT: Humor (01/21/04)
  • Re: REWRITE query (01/20/04)
  • OT (was: Standards question on edited fields (01/20/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/19/04)
  • Re: Convert Cobol to language w/o goto (was: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide???) (01/19/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/19/04)
  • Re: Call prototype vs Invoke was Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/19/04)
  • Re: PIC S9(3) COMP = gives compile error with fujitsu power cobol (01/18/04)
  • Re: For shame! Using OS/VS COBOL 90 years before it went off support! (01/17/04)
  • Re: how do i get a 4 digit year to appear in cobol (01/16/04)
  • COBOL FAQ (01/16/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/15/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: Standards question on edited fields (01/14/04)
  • Re: Mainframe - Cobol - CICS Program Question (01/13/04)
  • Re: IGYLI0090-W 3 sequence errors were found in this program. (01/13/04)
  • Re: Novice: All about COMP-3 fields (01/10/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/09/04)
  • Re: multiple file reads and sorts (01/09/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/07/04)
  • Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (01/06/04)
  • IBM User Group (SHARE) info (01/06/04)
  • OT - Humor (01/05/04)
  • Re: Y2K4 with XP (01/04/04)
  • Re: CoBOL moved to OO (01/02/04)
  • No panic - but .. Y2K + 4 (12/31/03)
• ypauls
  • *Yawn* (01/15/04)
• YukonMama
  • Re: Postal code what "Picture" (01/30/04)
  • Re: Red faces about Mars? (01/22/04)
  • Re: How many lines of Cobol running worldwide??? (01/11/04)

Last message date: 01/31/04
Archived on: 01/31/04 CET

---

781 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Cobol  > comp.lang.cobol  > 2004-01