Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000
docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 02/27/04
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Previous message: ru.igarashi_at_usask.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- In reply to: Joe \: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Next in thread: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Reply: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Feb 2004 18:59:08 -0500
In article <1077835194.418463@news-1.nethere.net>,
Joe \"Nuke Me Xemu\" Foster <jlf%40znet%2ecom> wrote:
><docdwarf@panix.com> wrote in message <news:c1lg7p$2tk$1@panix5.panix.com>...
>
>> In article <c1lfc3$1k5bdq$1@ID-193590.news.uni-berlin.de>,
>> Jamie Andrews; real address @ bottom of message <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>> > This is a discussion concerning the removal (rmgrouping)
>> >of the newsgroup "comp.software.year-2000".
>>
>> And a very interesting discussion it might be to follow.
>
>The End Of The Newsgroup As We Know It!
>
>Perhaps it should be renamed comp.software.teotwawki
>
>After all, we have more doomsdays scheduled for 2038,
>2106, and Y10K!
Stand back, stand back, no need to crowd... there's plenty enough to go
around for everybody!
DD
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Previous message: ru.igarashi_at_usask.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- In reply to: Joe \: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Next in thread: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Reply: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|