Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000
berlutte_at_sympatico.ca
Date: 02/27/04
- Next message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Previous message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Next in thread: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:58:56 -0800
On 26 Feb 2004 14:08:41 -0500, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>And a very interesting discussion it might be to follow.
Blast from the past (1999):
phinias_t_phoobar@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>
> In article <36e942de@news-out2.newsnerds.com>,
> "SB" <sborkowski@*nospam*dmci.net> wrote:
> > Only he knows for sure.
> >
>
> Shek, why would he work for that inept bunch of denialists? I'm sure he's
> doing better correcting his boss, Dilbert's, grammar somewhere in COBOL land.
No need for me to correct grammar... that's what a compiler is for.
DD
===============================================================
With plenty o' documentation too!
Such a dear to reignite our flames!
Ornella Fellazio
- Next message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Previous message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Next in thread: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|