Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000
berlutte_at_sympatico.ca
Date: 02/27/04
- Next message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Previous message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- In reply to: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Reply: EskWIRED_at_spamblock.panix.com: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:31:22 -0800
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:28:31 -0600, LX-i <lxi0007@netscape.net> wrote:
>Yes - but if that window is placed in only one place, it's easy for
>those who come after to slide the window. It's (IMO, of course) a
>legitimate fix where a complete redesign was cost-prohibitive. "Good
>enough" is a lot cheaper than "perfect".
Ah, but for those who come after, it's generally the deluge!
Or they never heard of 'sliding windows' and start moving it back and
forth, so's the pretty red lights will twinkle!
Awful!
- Next message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Previous message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- In reply to: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Reply: EskWIRED_at_spamblock.panix.com: "Re: Discussion: rmgroup comp.software.year-2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|