Re: Compile error
From: KL (klbjornme_at_aol.comjunkhell)
Date: 03/16/04
- Next message: KL: "Re: Compile error"
- Previous message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: XML reader/writer"
- In reply to: Michael Mattias: "Re: Compile error"
- Next in thread: KL: "Re: Compile error"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 16 Mar 2004 01:09:02 GMT
In article <RRh5c.34605$PY.33372@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>, "Michael Mattias"
<michael.mattias@gte.net> writes:
>"KL" <klbjornme@aol.comjunkhell> wrote in message
>news:20040314115159.00545.00004823@mb-m02.aol.com...
>> In article <of_4c.34307$PY.23991@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>, "Michael
>Mattias"
>> <michael.mattias@gte.net> writes:
>>
>> >But you could...
>> >
>> > Evaluate true
>> > when sal-po-asking >=95
>> >
>> > when sal-po-asking >=94 'by the way the greater than is moot
>here
>> >
>> Why is the greater that moot here? What would happen if I just used = and
>the
>> value turned out to be 94.5? Just wondering.
>
>Because I failed to consider the possibility of sal-po-asking being
>non-integer. No PICTURE clause was supplied and all your values looked like
>integers... so I just assumed they were integers.
>
>MCM
Then I am sorry for not including everything needed to understand the problem.
I would have sent the whole program if I thought it was needed, but was worried
about the space it would have taken up.
KL
- Next message: KL: "Re: Compile error"
- Previous message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: XML reader/writer"
- In reply to: Michael Mattias: "Re: Compile error"
- Next in thread: KL: "Re: Compile error"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]