Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program
From: William M. Klein (wmklein_at_nospam.netcom.com)
Date: 05/26/04
- Next message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: Standard(s) ... and all that Jazz"
- Previous message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: XML and OO COBOL"
- In reply to: David Frank: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Reply: dot: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:27:32 GMT
Michael,
Sorry that I got Mr. Frank posting to comp.lang.cobol (as well as
comp.lang.pli). In the PL/I group, most people have learned to just ignore him.
He CONSTANTLY says,
I made such-and-such a statement and no one contradicted me, so I must be right
or
I showed how to do this in Fortran and no one showed me how to do this in
"language x" so THEREFORE "language x" can't do it.
***
Unfortunately, if you ignore him, he doesn't go away - but if you "killfile"
him, at least you won't be bothered (too much) with his trivia, mis-information,
lack of logical conclusions, and basically irrelevant posts.
-- Bill Klein wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com "David Frank" <dave_frank@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:2tXsc.27782$Ol3.22280@twister.tampabay.rr.com... > > "Michael Mattias" <michael.mattias@gte.net> wrote in message > news:iUMsc.341$n65.105@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com... > > "David Frank" <dave_frank@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:mHHsc.21739$0X2.553701@twister.tampabay.rr.com... > >> > >> "Michael Mattias" <michael.mattias@gte.net> wrote in message > >> news:LZ0sc.3112$r22.1842@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com... > >> > > >> > I don't know PL/1, but I refuse to believe that any modern or even > >> > quasi-modern language does not offer the tools to solve this. > >> > >> Believe it, and for 40 more CANT's (perhaps including some cants for > >> your PowerBasic) > >> see: http://home.cfl.rr.com/davegemini/pli_cant.faq > > > > > > I actually took the time to read this, and I have an announcement to make; > > an announcement containing some good news and some bad news. > > > > The Good News: You have just won a lifetime achievement award. > > > > The Bad News: The Category in which you won is, "Poor workman who blames > > the > > tools." > > > > > > MCM > > PS Yes, I toned this down already. My gut reaction was, "What a load of > > whining drivel!" > > But I though it might be either impolite or impolitic to say that. > > > > So I take it, PowerBasic cant be used to post translations for these 40 > challenges right? > If thats not a true statement, show us the PowerBasic translation for just > CANT #1 or #2 or #3 (your choice).. > Robin sure CANT using PL/I .. > > http://home.cfl.rr.com/davegemini/pli_cant.faq > > I extend this challenge to the Cobol'ers as well, and since Mike Cowlishaw > is also reading this, to his REXX language. > >
- Next message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: Standard(s) ... and all that Jazz"
- Previous message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: XML and OO COBOL"
- In reply to: David Frank: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Reply: dot: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|