Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program
From: PAUL RAULERSON (pkraulerson_at_verizon.net)
Date: 05/31/04
- Previous message: John W. Kennedy: "Re: GROUP-USAGE (was Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- In reply to: Jeffery Swagger: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 03:46:23 GMT
<grin> You do have thin skins don't you?!
Relax, and if you really don't want to see the thread, just tell your
newsreader to ignore it.
-Paul
"Jeffery Swagger" <jeffos2@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:A6WdneaVVMOWFifd4p2dnA@adelphia.com...
> Oh horse hockey!
>
> There is a reason that different groups exist.
> COBOL has its own peculiarities unique to its
> practitioners as does PL/I as does C as does ...
>
> Just please stay on topic.
>
> ----
> Jeff
>
> "LX-i" <lxi0007@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:10bl0d7jor8nd4e@corp.supernews.com...
> > Jeffery Swagger wrote:
> >
> > > WTF does *any* of this have to do with PL/I?
> >
> > What does your ForTran or PL/1 have to do with us COBOLlers? It's an
> > offshoot of a cross-posted thread that may or may not drift back into
> > the realm of meaningfulness to ForTran or PL/1 folks... Threads often
> > meander, and I find it interesting to see little snips of code here and
> > there - helps expand my knowledge base. That may not be your thing, but
> > surely your skin isn't that thin, is it?
> >
>
- Previous message: John W. Kennedy: "Re: GROUP-USAGE (was Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- In reply to: Jeffery Swagger: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: Alternative COBOL "telco" source program"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]