Re: low-value
From: Howard Brazee (howard_at_brazee.net)
Date: 06/04/04
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Previous message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "BREAKIN': ROYAL BANK O' CANADUH IN CHAOS - NEEDS CODIN' FOOLS ASAP"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Reply: gripper5612: "Re: low-value"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:11:38 GMT
On 3-Jun-2004, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
> >> Leaving aside the validity of comparisons of human beings on the Path
> >> to Salvation to trained canines... how does one go about determining
> >> 'effectiveness' in such a situation? Are there studies about the ROI
> >> for The Saved?
> >
> >You put 'effectivness' on one side of the balance and 'uneffectivness' on
> >the other. See which is heavier, remembering mauve has more RAM.
>
> How interesting that when asked for 'determining' you give a mechanism for
> establishing equality of Mass.
Do we have to go to Mass for salvation? Is Mass. equal to Conn.?
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Previous message: berlutte_at_sympatico.ca: "BREAKIN': ROYAL BANK O' CANADUH IN CHAOS - NEEDS CODIN' FOOLS ASAP"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: low-value"
- Reply: gripper5612: "Re: low-value"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|