Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)
From: Richard (riplin_at_Azonic.co.nz)
Date: 07/02/04
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Previous message: BugALugs478_at_InfamousISP.gov: "Re: Memory-mapped video"
- Maybe in reply to: Chuck Stevens: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Next in thread: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Reply: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 1 Jul 2004 20:52:03 -0700
robert.deletethis@wagner.net (Robert Wagner) wrote
> Because they're not on the receiving end of hositility,
It seems to me that the ones on the receiving end of 'hostility' are
those that are accused of:
* creating a travesty
* are 'piss poor' programmers
* have a mediocre intellect
and several other insults you have distributed.
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Previous message: BugALugs478_at_InfamousISP.gov: "Re: Memory-mapped video"
- Maybe in reply to: Chuck Stevens: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Next in thread: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Reply: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|