Re: C-preprocessor for COBOL?
From: Warren Simmons (wsimmons5_at_optonline.net)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Opportunity Available"
- In reply to: Herwig Huener & Josella Simone Playton: "Re: C-preprocessor for COBOL?"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: C-preprocessor for COBOL?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:40:09 GMT
Herwig Huener & Josella Simone Playton wrote:
> 22:55:33 MESZ
>
> JerryMouse wrote:
>
> > ...
>
>>> The English language has some pitfalls ...
>>
>>
>>
>> That's why most of us speak COBOL.
>
>
> In COBOL, you get used to "noise words". If you
> use noise words in C, you call a library function
> you never heard about before. Neither has anyone
> else ...
>
> Herwig
>
Come to think of it, the TC group may have used BASH.
I remember reading about the task of reading the source code,
buyt at my age, I don't usually keep things straight for long.
Warren Simmons
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Opportunity Available"
- In reply to: Herwig Huener & Josella Simone Playton: "Re: C-preprocessor for COBOL?"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: C-preprocessor for COBOL?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]