Dead languages?
From: Michael Metcalf (michael.metcalf_at_t-online.de)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Arjen Markus: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Previous message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: Cobol Opportunity Available"
- Next in thread: Arjen Markus: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Arjen Markus: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: lurkerBob: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: UnDead languages?"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Robert Wagner: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:04:37 +0100
I just happened to hear an editor of the new edition of the Concise Oxford
English Dictionary say on the radio that obsolete words get removed to make
way for new ones. Her two examples were Snobol and Cobol. Is this a valid
definition of a dead computing language?
Regards,
Mike Metcalf
- Next message: Arjen Markus: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Previous message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: Cobol Opportunity Available"
- Next in thread: Arjen Markus: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Arjen Markus: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: lurkerBob: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: UnDead languages?"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Robert Wagner: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Gerry Thomas: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|