Re: Dead languages?
docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Richard Maine: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Previous message: Howard Brazee: "Re: Dead languages?"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Jul 2004 13:57:45 -0400
In article <ccjv0q$jlv$1@peabody.colorado.edu>,
Howard Brazee <howard@brazee.net> wrote:
[snip]
>But did that dictionary get rid of the word "Latin", to make way for "Java"?
>CoBOL is much more commonly used than Latin is.
Well, this thread's probably a troll... but I've noticed that 'commonly
used' is often dependent on where one looks; standing in a supermarket
check-out line I've often seen tabloid headlines of '(person) Hot About
New Latin Lover!'...
... and I imagine exchanges like 'Britannia insula est!' 'Gallia est omnis
divisa in partes tres!' 'Vidi, vici, veni!'
DD
- Next message: Richard Maine: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Previous message: Howard Brazee: "Re: Dead languages?"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Next in thread: Richard Maine: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Reply: Richard Maine: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|