Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?
docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- Previous message: William M. Klein: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- In reply to: JerryMouse: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 14 Jul 2004 21:22:41 -0400
In article <BuudnUBfVKgVAWjd4p2dnA@giganews.com>,
JerryMouse <nospam@bisusa.com> wrote:
>Frank Yaeger wrote:
[snip]
>> * IN1->T1: copy records and add blank in position 241
>> COPY FROM(IN1) TO(T1) USING(CTL1)
>> * IN2->T2: copy key and add byte from 349 in position 241
>> COPY FROM(IN2) TO(T2) USING(CTL2)
>> * T1/T2->OUT: Splice on key to add byte from 349 at
>> * position 241
>> SPLICE FROM(CON) TO(OUT) ON(2,9,CH) WITH(241,1)
[snip]
>The JCL is longer than the dirt-simple program he's trying to avoid.
Not when one reduces the JCL to the actual 'control' statements, much as I
reduced the COBOL down to the guts of the PROCEDURE DIVISION... but even
if it were the JCL would be part of a larger stream which has to be
submitted to Prod so there'd be no overall change, as opposed to making
another program and having to go through the documentation necessary to
include and maintain it.
DD
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- Previous message: William M. Klein: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- In reply to: JerryMouse: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Combining Fields From Files Without COBOL Pgm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
