Re: Layout Hell.
From: The Family (lgvwalk_at_swbell.net)
Date: 07/16/04
- Next message: Carol: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Previous message: Carol: "Re: Layout Hell."
- In reply to: William M. Klein: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 05:23:59 GMT
Perhaps not. I thought about that just as I was making that post.
But, I still was not aware that 77's & 01-99's could be mixed,
and further, why would someone want to? Frankly, I haven't
seen much use in 77's in some time anyway.
Thanks, for the update....
Gary
"William M. Klein" <wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:0IGJc.4104$mL5.2263@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Huh ???
>
> I think that MAY have been required by the '68 Standard - but not since.
Is
> there a compiler still supported that requires 77 levels to be coded
before
> 01-levels?
>
> --
> Bill Klein
> wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
> "The Family" <lgvwalk@swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:P0GJc.8950$OA6.6225@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > 77's always precede 01-99's. Other than that, I didn't really look
> > at the definition detail.
> >
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Carol" <kgdg@helkusa.com> wrote in message
> > news:JZCdnZ690pjbiWrd4p2dnA@comcast.com...
> > > Hi,
> > > Could I have some help with this layout?
> > > I am new to the layout scene, but if I could see some real examples, I
> > might
> > > get it. Then again, I might club myself with a shovel.
> > > Thank you.
> > > I just need to convert this file to Access or something normal.
> > > Do you have any thoughts?
> > > Thanks you.
> > >
> > > 77 FILLER PIC X(16) VALUE 'CTLG==(ANDERA)===='.
> > > 01 WWICTLG.
> > > 10 CTLGOP-CO-NO PIC X(3).
> > > 10 CTLGCONTROL-SET-SEQ-NO PIC S9(9) USAGE COMP.
> > > 10 CTLGINVOICE-SEQ-NO PIC S9(4) USAGE COMP.
> > > 10 CTLGAP-CNTRL-ENTITY-CD PIC X(4).
> > > 10 CTLGINVOICE-TYPE-CD PIC X(2).
> > > 10 CTLGLEGACY-VENDOR-NO PIC X(10).
> > > 10 CTLGAP-VENDOR-NO PIC X(30).
> > > 10 CTLGAP-PO-NO PIC X(30).
> > > 10 CTLGAP-INVOICE-NO PIC X(30).
> > > 10 CTLGINVOICE-DT PIC X(10).
> > > 10 CTLGTOTAL-INVOICE-AM PIC S9(11)V9(2) USAGE COMP-3.
> > > 10 CTLGTOTAL-MERCH-AM PIC S9(11)V9(2) USAGE COMP-3.
> > > 10 CTLGTERMS-CD PIC X(2).
> > > 10 CTLGCARRIER-CD PIC X(10).
> > > 10 CTLGCARRIER-PRO-NO PIC X(10).
> > > 10 CTLGSHIP-DT PIC X(10).
> > > 10 CTLGSHIP-VIA-CD PIC X(3).
> > > 10 CTLGSHIP-LOC-NO PIC X(3).
> > > 10 CTLGSHIP-WT PIC X(10).
> > > 10 CTLGSHIP-UNITS-DC PIC X(10).
> > > 10 CTLGSHIP-TY PIC X(2).
> > > 77 POSBOP-CO-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBCONTROL-SET-SEQ-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBINVOICE-SEQ-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBAP-CNTRL-ENTITY-CD PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBINVOICE-TYPE-CD PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBLEGACY-VENDOR-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBAP-VENDOR-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBAP-PO-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBAP-INVOICE-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBINVOICE-DT PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBTOTAL-INVOICE-AM PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBTOTAL-MERCH-AM PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBTERMS-CD PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBCARRIER-CD PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBCARRIER-PRO-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBSHIP-DT PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBSHIP-VIA-CD PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBSHIP-LOC-NO PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBSHIP-WT PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBSHIP-UNITS-DC PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > > 77 POSBSHIP-TY PIC S9(4) COMP.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Carol: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Previous message: Carol: "Re: Layout Hell."
- In reply to: William M. Klein: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: Layout Hell."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
