Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until
From: Michael Mattias (michael.mattias_at_gte.net)
Date: 07/17/04
- Next message: Michael Mattias: "Re: Layout Hell"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 21:31:32 GMT
<docdwarf@panix.com> wrote in message news:cdc5a4$qjn$1@panix5.panix.com...
> Dear me, Mr Wagner... do you believe that there's only one way to skin a
> cat, as well?
Considering your post earlier this very day...
">Do your binary search (SEARCH ALL) on your sorted table... when you get a
>hit, decrease your index in a loop to find where "target" values start in
>table, then scan though them in forward direction until you find the one
you
>want or the key changes; that is, let SEARCH ALL get you "on the correct
>block" and then walk from house to house.
This is the 'peeking and poking, above and below' which makes me...
uncomfortable."
....isn't this the pot calling the kettle black?
MCM
- Next message: Michael Mattias: "Re: Layout Hell"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Cobol Linear search Vs Perfrom Until"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|