Re: Dead languages?
docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: "Every Shop Has Some Assembler Somewhere" - course update"
- Previous message: E P Chandler: "Re: Cobol AS/400 BNF Help Please"
- In reply to: Mike Walters: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Next in thread: Joseph Katnic: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 19 Jul 2004 18:53:26 -0400
In article <cdh80o$c47$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>,
Mike Walters <walters@wisp.physics.YOURwisc.eduPANTS> wrote:
>docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>
>>>Unlike English, where normal word order is SVO (subject, verb, object), Latin,
>>>along with Japanese, has no normal word order. One can rearrange the words in a
>>>sentence and it still says the same thing.
>>
>>
>> This is similar to what I was taught about Ancient Greek, where order word
>> important is very not.
>
>
>Sound like Yoda, you do!
And some folks say that time spent studying dead languages is time
wasted... imagine that!
DD
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: "Every Shop Has Some Assembler Somewhere" - course update"
- Previous message: E P Chandler: "Re: Cobol AS/400 BNF Help Please"
- In reply to: Mike Walters: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Next in thread: Joseph Katnic: "Re: Dead languages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]