Re: If you were inventing CoBOL...
From: Robert Wagner (robert_at_wagner.net.yourmammaharvests)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: Tom Morrison: "Re: Is a General File Maintenance Routine possible?"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- In reply to: Chuck Stevens: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- Next in thread: Chuck Stevens: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- Reply: Chuck Stevens: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:10:05 GMT
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:23:42 -0700, "Chuck Stevens"
<charles.stevens@unisys.com> wrote:
>
>"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote in message
>news:cifg46$47q$1@peabody.colorado.edu...
>
>> I'd just avoid that syntax altogether. English speakers who understand
>> arithmetic understand COMPUTE just fine.
>
>I don't mind using the arithmetic verbs, but I *always* do so with GIVING,
>which eliminates any ambiguity, as a matter of style.
Now we know the origin of "Add 1 to Cobol giving Cobol."
- Next message: Tom Morrison: "Re: Is a General File Maintenance Routine possible?"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- In reply to: Chuck Stevens: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- Next in thread: Chuck Stevens: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- Reply: Chuck Stevens: "Re: If you were inventing CoBOL..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]