Re: a history question
From: JerryMouse (nospam_at_bisusa.com)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: String Functions in MF"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: String Functions in MF"
- In reply to: Robert Wagner: "Re: a history question"
- Next in thread: Robert Wagner: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Robert Wagner: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Richard: "Re: a history question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:58:39 -0500
Robert Wagner wrote:
>
> Microsoft wrote their own JVM, which included extensions that work
> only on a MS platform. MS said they fixed a weakness in the spec,
> which was true. The Sun licensing contract says outsiders developing a
> JVM are not allowed to hurt portability by adding proprietary
> features. Sun sued MS and won. Rather than fix their JVM, Microsoft
> got in a snit, removed it from the market and stopped supporting old
> copies. XP users must download their JVM from Sun.
Not so. XP users need not download JVM from Sun.
They can actually they should do the reverse - purge all reference to Java
from their system.
- Next message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: String Functions in MF"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: String Functions in MF"
- In reply to: Robert Wagner: "Re: a history question"
- Next in thread: Robert Wagner: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Robert Wagner: "Re: a history question"
- Reply: Richard: "Re: a history question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|