Re: [OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder
From: Pete Dashwood (dashwood_at_enternet.co.nz)
Date: 10/23/04
- Next message: Lueko Willms: "PERFORM FOREVER (was: Report enhancements)"
- Previous message: Rick Smith: "Re: Report enhancements"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "[OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: [OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: [OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: [OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:00:11 +1300
<docdwarf@panix.com> wrote in message news:clb6kv$ei9$1@panix5.panix.com...
>
> As some might have noticed... when words like 'obvious' or 'clarity' get
> bandied about my Standard Response is 'Obvious is in the mind of the
> beholder'; a few minutes back the Muse descended upon me and provided me
> with the following example:
>
> F + 1 = 10
>
> Clearly obvious... and with obvious clarity, neh?
>
> DD
>
>
Given no context, I'm not sure what this is about, Doc.
I took it to be hex arithmetic.
((base-1) + 1 = base)
Is there a point I'm missing here?
Pete.
- Next message: Lueko Willms: "PERFORM FOREVER (was: Report enhancements)"
- Previous message: Rick Smith: "Re: Report enhancements"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "[OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: [OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: [OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: [OT] 'Obvious' is in the Mind of the Beholder"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|