Re: Perform loop enhancements
From: Chuck Stevens (charles.stevens_at_unisys.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Lueko Willms: "Re: Report enhancements"
- Previous message: Rick Smith: "Re: Report enhancements"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:27:07 -0700
"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote in message
news:clrm18$8j4$1@peabody.colorado.edu...
> I hadn't heard of EXIT PERFORM CYCLE. It would take major pushing by IBM
to
> get many shops to upgrade, so I don't know if I will ever see it.
Not more than any other feature in the 2002 standard, and in my opinion it
wouldn't take much to provide it in an implementation that already had EXIT
PERFORM
> Too bad that ability isn't complete.
Which ability? The ability to do an EXIT PERFORM CYCLE in an out-of-line
PERFORM? Yeah, I think I'd argue for that, unless (again) somebody can
convince me it's a bad idea!
-Chuck Stevens
- Next message: Lueko Willms: "Re: Report enhancements"
- Previous message: Rick Smith: "Re: Report enhancements"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|