Re: Perform loop enhancements
From: Peter Lacey (lacey_at_mb.sympatico.ca)
Date: 10/29/04
- Previous message: Peter E.C Dashwood: "Re: Standard and COBOL file formats"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Next in thread: Richard: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Reply: Richard: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:47:02 -0500
Richard wrote:
>
> Peter Lacey <lacey@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote
>
> > Seems to me you're adhering to a principle at the expense of
> > simplicity. If you have two different types of your exit
> > paragraph/perform, and both of them are exactly equivalent to a GOTO -
> > why not use a GOTO? Then there'd be no question as to which type of
> > exit you're doing, nor would there be any doubt as to where control
> > resumes.
>
> This seems to be the trigger for where I do my usual discourse on "it
> isn't the GOTO that is harmful, it is the label that it requires that
> is the probelem", but I won't.
Good, I suppose. Why bother composing this? Ranting about the label
wouldn't address the subject.
PL
- Previous message: Peter E.C Dashwood: "Re: Standard and COBOL file formats"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Next in thread: Richard: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Reply: Richard: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|