Re: Perform loop enhancements
From: Richard (riplin_at_Azonic.co.nz)
Date: 10/29/04
- Previous message: Michael Wojcik: "Re: OT English Language, Program or Programme"
- In reply to: Peter Lacey: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Next in thread: Robert Wagner: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Oct 2004 11:48:56 -0700
Peter Lacey <lacey@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote
> > This seems to be the trigger for where I do my usual discourse on "it
> > isn't the GOTO that is harmful, it is the label that it requires that
> > is the probelem", but I won't.
>
> Good, I suppose. Why bother composing this?
Well that's what I thought. Those that would agree with it already
understand the issue, those that still think that GOTO is OK to use
wouldn't agree with the discussion.
> Ranting about the label wouldn't address the subject.
Labels are very much part of the subject of out-of-line PERFORMs and
their scope. When labels can possibly exist within the scope (which
they cannot when PERFORM paragraph is all that is used), there are
potential problems that don't otherwise exist.
- Previous message: Michael Wojcik: "Re: OT English Language, Program or Programme"
- In reply to: Peter Lacey: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Next in thread: Robert Wagner: "Re: Perform loop enhancements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|