Re: Report enhancements

From: Jeff York (ralf4_at_btinternet.com)
Date: 10/31/04 

Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:05:46 +0000

Robert Wagner <spamblocker-robert@wagner.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:51:50 -0700, "Chuck Stevens"
><charles.stevens@unisys.com> wrote:

>>I agree that an out-of-line indefinite PERFORM pretty much requires either
>>the despised GO TO or the prohibited EXIT PERFORM, but I'm not really
>>opposed to relaxing the restriction on the latter, unless someone convinces
>>me that there's a good reason why it's there.
>
>I can't think of a good reason.

One would have thought that the truly astonishing degree of mental
masturbation exhibited by those wishing to avoid either of these
simple constructs would be reason enough. 

-- 
Jeff.         Ironbridge,  Shrops,  U.K.
jjy@jakfield.xu-netx.com  (remove the x..x round u-net for return address)
and don't bother with ralf4, it's a spamtrap and I never go there.. :)
... "There are few hours in life more agreeable
      than the hour dedicated to the ceremony
      known as afternoon tea.."
         Henry James,  (1843 - 1916).

Relevant Pages