Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits
From: Robert Wagner (spamblocker-robert_at_wagner.net)
Date: 11/16/04
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- In reply to: William M. Klein: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Next in thread: William M. Klein: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Reply: William M. Klein: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Reply: Richard: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:05:39 GMT
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:36:25 GMT, "William M. Klein"
<wmklein@nospam.netcom.com> wrote:
>Richard,
> The quote that Robert included was for fixed format. The issue is when you
>code:
>
> 01 A.
>
>The "01" has to be in the A-margin, but the '85 Standard (semi-clearly) states
>that the "A" can also be in the A-margin. What I don't know is whether this was
>or wasn't also true in the '74 Standard.
It was not.
>"more extreme" - and related to the original question of where a period is
>allowed, the question is whether you could (in a conforming '74 compiler) code:
>
> 1 A.
If period is valid in column 11, it is also valid in column 8. The
original question was about code like this:
01 A
. 02 B
. 02 C
. 01 D
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- In reply to: William M. Klein: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Next in thread: William M. Klein: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Reply: William M. Klein: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Reply: Richard: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|