Re: Mainframers ... according to RW (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits
From: Robert Wagner (spamblocker-robert_at_wagner.net)
Date: 11/16/04
- Next message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: OT - CICS Problem"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Mainframers ... according to RW (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Mainframers ... according to RW (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Mainframers ... according to RW (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:05:40 GMT
On 15 Nov 2004 20:43:25 -0500, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>>Suppose, hypothetically, we were
>>sampling a batch of data files (somehow) known to be identical.
>
>Suppose, Mr Wagner, we try not to compare human beings, with their
>associated complexities, to 'a batch of data files (somehow) known to be
>identical'.
Tell it to A.C. Nielsen and others who use statistics on human beings.
Tell them 'I'm unique, just like everyone else.' Also, stop taking
prescription drugs because they were all validated using statistics.
- Next message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: OT - CICS Problem"
- Previous message: Robert Wagner: "Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Mainframers ... according to RW (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Mainframers ... according to RW (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Mainframers ... according to RW (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]