Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS
From: Robert Wagner (spamblocker-robert_at_wagner.net)
Date: 12/08/04
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes"
- Previous message: Don Leahy: "Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS"
- Next in thread: Richard: "Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:02:07 GMT
On 7 Dec 2004 18:40:20 -0800, "Richard" <riplin@Azonic.co.nz> wrote:
>> The 'non-standard extensions' (to '85) are in the CURRENT Cobol
>> Standard, and supported by both Micro Focus and Fujitsu.
>
>No they aren't. For example the EVALUATE that is not allowed is
>rejected by Fujitsu (based on actual testing):
>
>JMN2535I-S WORD '=' CANNOT BE SPECIFIED IN EVALUATE STATEMENT.
You're right. The POINT of the shop standard was don't deviate from
the spec. Evaluate was an example. I should have used a conforming
example.
>Being in the current standard is irrelevant until compilers for that
>standard are generally available and have been moved into production
>use.
Some of the prohibitions have been in place 20 years: COPY ..
REPLACING, REDEFINES, no periods, ctc.
- Next message: Robert Wagner: "Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes"
- Previous message: Don Leahy: "Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS"
- Next in thread: Richard: "Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|