comp.lang.cobol
By Author

1363 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 11/30/04
Ending: 12/31/04

• Ace
  • Mainframe Integration Architect Need - US - MA (12/08/04)
• Alistair Maclean
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (12/04/04)
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (12/04/04)
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (12/01/04)
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (12/01/04)
  • Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
• Angelo
  • Report for Cobol (12/22/04)
• Anthony Dilworth
  • Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. (12/02/04)
  • Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. (12/02/04)
• Arnold Trembley
  • Re: Email from JCL with attachment (12/21/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (VSAM) (12/14/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: Languages (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
• Betocent
  • Re: Read a pds file whit cobol (12/17/04)
  • Re: Read a pds file whit cobol (12/16/04)
  • Re: Read a pds file whit cobol (12/16/04)
  • Read a pds file whit cobol (12/15/04)
• Bill Gentry
  • Email from JCL with attachment (12/21/04)
• Bill Yarnall
  • Re: Semaphore failure. Rerun as root (12/09/04)
• Binyamin Dissen
  • Re: COBOL (12/24/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
• Bob Wolfe
  • Commercial Product Announcement - Micro Focus Dialog System Screenset Conversion Service (12/31/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/16/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/16/04)
  • Linux and security (12/14/04)
• breilly00
  • Re: Decompiler for Acucobol (12/29/04)
• Buck Black
  • Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (12/11/04)
  • SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (12/11/04)
• carlos_avalos1_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Output file passed to Davox where money field appears incorrect. (12/06/04)
• CarSalesman
  • Fujitsu PowerForm error messages (12/19/04)
• Charles Godwin
  • Re: Realia Cobol and XP SP2 (12/16/04)
• Charles W. Cribbs II
  • Re: MicroFocus C-Isam Index Rebuild 9/037 (12/05/04)
• Cheesle
  • Re: need new Cobol (12/01/04)
  • Re: Cobol compiler for cross plattform (WinXP/zOS) development (12/01/04)
• Chris
  • Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns (12/17/04)
  • Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns (12/17/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/09/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/09/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/07/04)
  • Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/07/04)
  • Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/07/04)
  • Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/07/04)
  • Calling An Interactive Editor From COBOL Application (12/02/04)
• Chuck Stevens
  • Re: COBOL (12/24/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
  • Re: FUNCTION LENGTH() in PERFORM VARYING (12/21/04)
  • Re: SUM clause in REPORT WRITER - Problems (12/21/04)
  • Re: append a string to another (12/21/04)
  • Re: append a string to another (12/20/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
  • Re: XML Standard (12/17/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
  • Re: XML Standard (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/15/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/13/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/13/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
• Clark F. Morris, Jr.
  • OT Rail vs truck was Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/29/04)
  • Sort verb getting bad reputation was Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/19/04)
  • SORTLIB should be dead was Re: [OT] Obvious Is In The Mind Of The Beholder - JCL illustrIllustration (12/16/04)
• clvrmnky
  • Re: append a string to another (12/20/04)
  • Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? (12/10/04)
• David Essex
  • Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? (12/11/04)
• deepu
  • urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
• docdwarf_at_panix.com
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/31/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/31/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Merry Christmas (12/30/04)
  • Re: OT Greetings (12/29/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/25/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Merry Christmas (12/18/04)
  • Re: Read Unknown Length record (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: Mainframe Integration Architect Need - US - MA (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: University of Washington COBOL positions (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person (12/03/04)
  • Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person (12/03/04)
  • Re: OT : Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/03/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. (12/02/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/01/04)
  • Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
• Don Leahy
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
• Donald Tees
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
  • Re: append a string to another (12/20/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
• E P Chandler
  • Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. (12/02/04)
• epc8_at_juno.com
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
• erika_angella_at_yahoo.com
  • A VoIP usergroup (12/29/04)
• esgyhikg_at_freedvd.com
  • Hot 22 Year Old Looking For Love Or More.....Please Contact Me.......... FME4 (12/30/04)
• Euro
  • Re: Status 39 (12/22/04)
  • SP2 from Fujitsu and Windows XP (12/21/04)
  • Status 39 (12/21/04)
• Euromercante
  • Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) (12/03/04)
  • Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) (12/02/04)
• foodman123_at_aol.com
  • Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. (12/02/04)
• Frank Swarbrick
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
• Frank Yaeger
  • New DFSORT/ICETOOL Features (Dec, 2004) (12/17/04)
• Frederico Fonseca
  • Re: Communications Control (12/18/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/12/04)
  • Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (12/11/04)
  • Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) (12/03/04)
  • Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) (12/02/04)
• Hannah
  • Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person (12/03/04)
  • Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person (12/02/04)
• hillscap_at_pacbell.net
  • Re: Down and dirty Britney Spears (12/28/04)
• Howard Brazee
  • Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns (12/30/04)
  • Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns (12/30/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/20/04)
  • Re: append a string to another (12/20/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/15/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/15/04)
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/14/04)
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/14/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/14/04)
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Languages (12/06/04)
  • Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Free format (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: Marriage and the family (12/06/04)
  • Re: Fortress COBOL - some conclusions (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Compile option (12/03/04)
  • Re: Compile option (12/03/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: OT : Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/03/04)
  • Re: Compile option (12/03/04)
  • Compile option (12/03/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: OT: Marriage and the family (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
• http://tinyurl.com/5em8l
  • comp.lang.java.programmer,alt.games.tolkien.rpg,alt.autos.gm.olds-cutlass,alt.business.consulting,comp.lang.cobol (12/28/04)
  • alt.italian.anime-manga,alt.support.skin-diseases.psoriasis,alt.abuse.offender.recovery,comp.lang.cobol,comp.sys.mac.scitech (12/27/04)
• http://tinyurl.com/6kmea
  • Re: matt parker is guilty of illegal people trafficking and will be prosecuted (12/01/04)
• Ian Dalziel
  • Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person (12/03/04)
• info_at_hillscapital.com
  • Re: alt.support.divorce,alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000,comp.lang.cobol,alt.tech.digital-tv.select401,microsoft.public.pocketpc.marketplace (12/28/04)
  • Re: matt parker from cottage grove oregon is a big piece of shit (12/28/04)
• James J. Gavan
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • Re: utility to read cobol data files? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: XML Standard (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • XML Standard (12/16/04)
  • Re: utility to read cobol data files? (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/12/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/12/04)
  • Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (12/12/04)
  • Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/12/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: Style - OO vs User-Defined Functions (12/09/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: ASLM: Semaphore failure. Rerun as root (12/08/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT Brooklyn Bridge defense (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 (12/06/04)
  • Re: Languages (12/06/04)
  • Re: Languages (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/05/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/05/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/04/04)
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (12/04/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/03/04)
  • OT : Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/03/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/03/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/03/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/03/04)
  • Re: Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network (12/02/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (11/30/04)
• Jeff York
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
• JerryMouse
  • Re: Status 39 (12/21/04)
  • Re: append a string to another (12/20/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/17/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • Re: Read Unknown Length record (12/17/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/16/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/15/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/08/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/08/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/07/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/07/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/06/04)
  • OT - Take that Linux! (12/06/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. (12/02/04)
• JGH
  • Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer (12/07/04)
• JJ
  • Re: append a string to another (12/21/04)
• Joe Zitzelberger
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/31/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/31/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/31/04)
  • Re: append a string to another (12/23/04)
  • Re: Writing sysout messages to specified DD (12/20/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: Read a pds file whit cobol (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: Read a pds file whit cobol (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/15/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? (12/10/04)
  • Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/06/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/06/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
• John Smith
  • Re: utility to read cobol data files? (12/15/04)
  • utility to read cobol data files? (12/15/04)
• Jonathan
  • MicroFocus C-Isam Index Rebuild 9/037 (12/05/04)
• Just Me!
  • 123 (12/08/04)
• Karl Kiesel
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/02/04)
• KELLIEFITTON_at_YAHOO.COM
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/14/04)
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/14/04)
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/13/04)
  • Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/13/04)
• Lueko Willms
  • Re: COBOL (12/24/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
  • Re: SUM clause in REPORT WRITER - Problems (12/21/04)
  • FUNCTION LENGTH() in PERFORM VARYING (12/21/04)
  • SUM clause in REPORT WRITER - Problems (12/21/04)
  • Re: append a string to another (12/20/04)
  • Re: Merry Christmas (12/18/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/18/04)
  • Re: XML Standard (12/17/04)
  • RFID (was: Program templates as Object Classes) (12/17/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • Re: XML Standard (12/17/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • OT: To scan or not to scan (was: OT - Re: Program templates as Object) (12/16/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/15/04)
  • XML parsing and generating (was: Program templates as Object Classes) (12/14/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Free Format (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits) (12/06/04)
  • Re: Fortress COBOL - a spam advertisement (12/06/04)
  • Free Format (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits) (12/06/04)
  • Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Languages (was: Program templates as Object Classes) (12/05/04)
  • Vindication of SECTION (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits) (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 (12/05/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Free format (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description (12/03/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni (12/03/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni (12/02/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/02/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/02/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/01/04)
  • Re: Is COBOL being widely used? (Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE) (12/01/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/01/04)
  • Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Is COBOL being widely used? (Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE) (12/01/04)
  • Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator (12/01/04)
• LX-i
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/31/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Merry Christmas (12/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] Merry Christmas (12/30/04)
  • Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns (12/30/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/30/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/30/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/30/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/30/04)
  • [OT] Merry Christmas (12/18/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/09/04)
  • Re: Style - OO vs User-Defined Functions (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/09/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/09/04)
  • Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/09/04)
  • Re: Fortress COBOL - some conclusions (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... (12/04/04)
  • Re: website hosting (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT: Marriage and the family (12/04/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/04/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/03/04)
  • Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... (12/03/04)
  • Re: website hosting (12/03/04)
  • Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/03/04)
  • Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE (12/03/04)
  • Re: OT: Marriage and the family (12/02/04)
  • Re: MF Isam problems (12/02/04)
• mail_at_sanface.com
  • PLUG: txt2pdf 7.6 (12/09/04)
• maju
  • searching for a mainframe project (12/31/04)
• Manfred Niendiek
  • Re: append a string to another (12/20/04)
• Michael Mattias
  • Re: utility to read cobol data files? (12/15/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
• Michael Wojcik
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/09/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/09/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/07/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
• mosnar
  • Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? (12/13/04)
  • Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? (12/07/04)
  • Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? (12/07/04)
• Muralidhar
  • MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 (12/05/04)
• patrick.magee_at_microfocus.com
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/21/04)
• Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBOL (12/24/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/24/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/24/04)
  • OT: Holiday reading (12/24/04)
  • Re: COBOL (12/23/04)
  • Re: Fujitsu PowerForm error messages (12/19/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/18/04)
  • Re: XML Standard (12/18/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/18/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: urgent query!!! (12/18/04)
  • Re: Communications Control (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/17/04)
  • Re: XML Standard (12/17/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (VSAM) (12/14/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (12/13/04)
  • Re: Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • OT:Insurance WAS Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (LONG with sample code) (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: Style - OO vs User-Defined Functions (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/08/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/07/04)
  • Re: Fortress COBOL - some conclusions (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT - Take that Linux! (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/07/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/06/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/06/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/05/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/05/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/05/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/05/04)
  • OT: Collections in COBOL standard WAS Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/05/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/05/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni (12/04/04)
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (12/04/04)
  • Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/04/04)
  • OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/04/04)
  • Re: OT: Marriage and the family (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptionin programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: slightly OT: Project Managers (12/02/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/02/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/02/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
  • Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits (12/01/04)
  • Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages (12/01/04)
• Peter Lacey
  • Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/07/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/06/04)
• Qolin
  • Re: FBI turned AMERICA into a NATION of PROGRAMMED SLAVES and ROBOTS (12/03/04)
• R.Freitag
  • Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person (12/02/04)
• Renfrew
  • Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network (12/01/04)
• renfrewthejust_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network (12/02/04)
• Richard
  • Re: Linux and security (12/31/04)
  • Re: Status 39 (12/22/04)
  • Re: FUNCTION LENGTH() in PERFORM VARYING (12/21/04)
  • Re: Email from JCL with attachment (12/21/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/20/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/17/04)
  • Re: Read Unknown Length record (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/17/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/16/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/15/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: Linux and security (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/15/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/14/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/13/04)
  • Re: Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails (12/13/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/12/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/12/04)
  • Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (12/11/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/11/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/10/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? (12/09/04)
  • Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/09/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)
  • Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes (12/08/04)
  • Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (12/08/04)</