comp.lang.cobol
By Date

1363 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 11/30/04
Ending: 12/31/04

• Re: Linux and security Richard (12/31/04)
• Commercial Product Announcement - Micro Focus Dialog System Screenset Conversion Service Bob Wolfe (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/31/04)
• searching for a mainframe project maju (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/31/04)
• Re: Linux and security Joe Zitzelberger (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/31/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/30/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/30/04)
• Re: [OT] Merry Christmas LX-i (12/30/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Robert Wagner (12/30/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Howard Brazee (12/30/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Robert Wagner (12/30/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Howard Brazee (12/30/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Robert Wagner (12/30/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/30/04)
• Re: [OT] Merry Christmas docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/30/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns rjones0_at_hotmail.com (12/30/04)
• Re: [OT] Merry Christmas LX-i (12/30/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns LX-i (12/30/04)
• Re: Linux and security LX-i (12/30/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/30/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/30/04)
• Hot 22 Year Old Looking For Love Or More.....Please Contact Me.......... FME4 esgyhikg_at_freedvd.com (12/30/04)
• Re: OT Rail vs truck was Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/30/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/30/04)
• Re: Decompiler for Acucobol Robert Wagner (12/29/04)
• OT Rail vs truck was Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Clark F. Morris, Jr. (12/29/04)
• Re: Decompiler for Acucobol breilly00 (12/29/04)
• A VoIP usergroup erika_angella_at_yahoo.com (12/29/04)
• COBOL FAQ William M Klein (12/29/04)
• Re: OT Greetings docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/29/04)
• OT Greetings Robert (12/28/04)
• Re: Down and dirty Britney Spears hillscap_at_pacbell.net (12/28/04)
• Re: matt parker from cottage grove oregon is a big piece of shit info_at_hillscapital.com (12/28/04)
• comp.lang.java.programmer,alt.games.tolkien.rpg,alt.autos.gm.olds-cutlass,alt.business.consulting,comp.lang.cobol http://tinyurl.com/5em8l (12/28/04)
• Re: alt.support.divorce,alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000,comp.lang.cobol,alt.tech.digital-tv.select401,microsoft.public.pocketpc.marketplace info_at_hillscapital.com (12/28/04)
• alt.italian.anime-manga,alt.support.skin-diseases.psoriasis,alt.abuse.offender.recovery,comp.lang.cobol,comp.sys.mac.scitech http://tinyurl.com/5em8l (12/27/04)
• Re: COBOL docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/25/04)
• Re: COBOL Binyamin Dissen (12/24/04)
• Re: COBOL Pete Dashwood (12/24/04)
• Re: COBOL docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/24/04)
• Re: COBOL Lueko Willms (12/24/04)
• Re: COBOL Pete Dashwood (12/24/04)
• Re: COBOL Pete Dashwood (12/24/04)
• OT: Holiday reading Pete Dashwood (12/24/04)
• Re: COBOL Chuck Stevens (12/24/04)
• Re: COBOL Howard Brazee (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Binyamin Dissen (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Lueko Willms (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Chuck Stevens (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Howard Brazee (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Pete Dashwood (12/23/04)
• Re: append a string to another Vaclav Snajdr (12/23/04)
• Re: append a string to another Joe Zitzelberger (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Donald Tees (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Donald Tees (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL Robert Wagner (12/23/04)
• Re: COBOL William M. Klein (12/22/04)
• COBOL TammyBain (12/22/04)
• Re: Status 39 Richard (12/22/04)
• Report for Cobol Angelo (12/22/04)
• Re: Status 39 Euro (12/22/04)
• Re: SUM clause in REPORT WRITER - Problems Lueko Willms (12/21/04)
• Re: FUNCTION LENGTH() in PERFORM VARYING Chuck Stevens (12/21/04)
• Re: FUNCTION LENGTH() in PERFORM VARYING Richard (12/21/04)
• Re: SUM clause in REPORT WRITER - Problems Chuck Stevens (12/21/04)
• FUNCTION LENGTH() in PERFORM VARYING Lueko Willms (12/21/04)
• SUM clause in REPORT WRITER - Problems Lueko Willms (12/21/04)
• UNICODE in Realia 6.2 Volker Thebrath (12/21/04)
• Re: append a string to another Chuck Stevens (12/21/04)
• Re: Status 39 Thane (12/21/04)
• Re: Status 39 JerryMouse (12/21/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! patrick.magee_at_microfocus.com (12/21/04)
• SP2 from Fujitsu and Windows XP Euro (12/21/04)
• Status 39 Euro (12/21/04)
• Re: Email from JCL with attachment Arnold Trembley (12/21/04)
• Re: Email from JCL with attachment YukonMama (12/21/04)
• Re: append a string to another JJ (12/21/04)
• Email from JCL with attachment Bill Gentry (12/21/04)
• Re: Email from JCL with attachment Richard (12/21/04)
• Re: append a string to another Chuck Stevens (12/20/04)
• Re: append a string to another JerryMouse (12/20/04)
• Re: Writing sysout messages to specified DD S Comstock (12/20/04)
• Re: append a string to another Lueko Willms (12/20/04)
• Re: Linux and security Howard Brazee (12/20/04)
• Re: append a string to another Howard Brazee (12/20/04)
• Re: Linux and security steve.t (12/20/04)
• Re: XML Standard Tom Morrison (12/20/04)
• Re: append a string to another Donald Tees (12/20/04)
• Re: append a string to another Manfred Niendiek (12/20/04)
• Re: append a string to another clvrmnky (12/20/04)
• Re: Writing sysout messages to specified DD Joe Zitzelberger (12/20/04)
• append a string to another Tobias Neubert (12/20/04)
• COBOL FAQ William M Klein (12/20/04)
• Re: Linux and security Richard (12/20/04)
• Re: Fujitsu PowerForm error messages Pete Dashwood (12/19/04)
• Writing sysout messages to specified DD summit (12/19/04)
• Writing sysout messages to specified DD summit (12/19/04)
• Fujitsu PowerForm error messages CarSalesman (12/19/04)
• Re: Linux and security steve.t (12/19/04)
• Re: Linux and security Scott Moore (12/19/04)
• Sort verb getting bad reputation was Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Clark F. Morris, Jr. (12/19/04)
• Re: Communications Control Frederico Fonseca (12/18/04)
• Re: [OT] Merry Christmas docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/18/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: Merry Christmas Lueko Willms (12/18/04)
• Re: Communications Control Lueko Willms (12/18/04)
• [OT] Merry Christmas LX-i (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! James J. Gavan (12/18/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/18/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/18/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/18/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: XML Standard Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: Communications Control Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: Communications Control Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Chuck Stevens (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Chuck Stevens (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Pete Dashwood (12/18/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/17/04)
• Re: Communications Control JerryMouse (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Chuck Stevens (12/17/04)
• Re: XML Standard Chuck Stevens (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/17/04)
• Re: Communications Control JerryMouse (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! William M. Klein (12/17/04)
• New DFSORT/ICETOOL Features (Dec, 2004) Frank Yaeger (12/17/04)
• Re: XML Standard Tom Morrison (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/17/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Chris (12/17/04)
• Re: Read a pds file whit cobol Betocent (12/17/04)
• Re: Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Thomas A. Li (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! James J. Gavan (12/17/04)
• Re: Communications Control James J. Gavan (12/17/04)
• Re: XML Standard Lueko Willms (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Chuck Stevens (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! Chuck Stevens (12/17/04)
• Re: XML Standard Tom Morrison (12/17/04)
• RFID (was: Program templates as Object Classes) Lueko Willms (12/17/04)
• Re: Read a pds file whit cobol Joe Zitzelberger (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/17/04)
• Pro*COBOL and CLOB Columns Chris (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/17/04)
• Re: Communications Control Pete Dashwood (12/17/04)
• Re: urgent query!!! JerryMouse (12/17/04)
• Re: Communications Control Lueko Willms (12/17/04)
• Re: Communications Control JerryMouse (12/17/04)
• urgent query!!! deepu (12/17/04)
• Re: XML Standard Lueko Willms (12/17/04)
• Re: Communications Control Lueko Willms (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/17/04)
• Re: Read Unknown Length record Robert Wagner (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/17/04)
• Communications Control JerryMouse (12/17/04)
• Re: Read Unknown Length record JerryMouse (12/17/04)
• Re: Read Unknown Length record docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/17/04)
• Re: Read Unknown Length record Richard (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/17/04)
• Re: utility to read cobol data files? James J. Gavan (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/17/04)
• Re: XML Standard James J. Gavan (12/17/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/17/04)
• Re: XML Standard Pete Dashwood (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/17/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/17/04)
• Read Unknown Length record svaranas_at_hotmail.com (12/16/04)
• Re: utility to read cobol data files? Tom Morrison (12/16/04)
• Re: Linux and security Bob Wolfe (12/16/04)
• Re: Linux and security Bob Wolfe (12/16/04)
• Re: XML Standard Tom Morrison (12/16/04)
• Re: Read a pds file whit cobol William M. Klein (12/16/04)
• Re: Read a pds file whit cobol Betocent (12/16/04)
• Re: Realia Cobol and XP SP2 Charles Godwin (12/16/04)
• SORTLIB should be dead was Re: [OT] Obvious Is In The Mind Of The Beholder - JCL illustrIllustration Clark F. Morris, Jr. (12/16/04)
• Realia Cobol and XP SP2 TM-DDA (12/16/04)
• Re: Read a pds file whit cobol Betocent (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/16/04)
• Re: XML Standard Chuck Stevens (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/16/04)
• Re: Read a pds file whit cobol Joe Zitzelberger (12/16/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/16/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/16/04)
• Re: Linux and security JerryMouse (12/16/04)
• OT: To scan or not to scan (was: OT - Re: Program templates as Object) Lueko Willms (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/16/04)
• J4 and "real world" implementations of '02 Standard William M. Klein (12/16/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/16/04)
• Re: Read a pds file whit cobol steve.t (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/16/04)
• XML Standard James J. Gavan (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/16/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/16/04)
• Re: utility to read cobol data files? James J. Gavan (12/16/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/16/04)
• Re: utility to read cobol data files? Tom Morrison (12/15/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Chuck Stevens (12/15/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/15/04)
• Read a pds file whit cobol Betocent (12/15/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Chuck Stevens (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security Richard (12/15/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security Richard (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/15/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/15/04)
• Re: utility to read cobol data files? John Smith (12/15/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: utility to read cobol data files? Michael Mattias (12/15/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Howard Brazee (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security JerryMouse (12/15/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/15/04)
• utility to read cobol data files? John Smith (12/15/04)
• Re: New book written by z/OS testers William M. Klein (12/15/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/15/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/15/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Robert Wagner (12/15/04)
• Structured Cobol: Fundamentals And Style Some Guy (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security steve.t (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security Joe Zitzelberger (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security Richard (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security Tim Boyer (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/15/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Peter Lacey (12/15/04)
• Re: Linux and security JerryMouse (12/15/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/15/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/15/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: Linux and security Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/14/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/14/04)
• Linux and security Bob Wolfe (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Howard Brazee (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Jeff York (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/14/04)
• XML parsing and generating (was: Program templates as Object Classes) Lueko Willms (12/14/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes William M. Klein (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? William M. Klein (12/14/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (VSAM) Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (VSAM) William M. Klein (12/14/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS (VSAM) Arnold Trembley (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/14/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/14/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/14/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes William M. Klein (12/14/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... KELLIEFITTON_at_YAHOO.COM (12/14/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... KELLIEFITTON_at_YAHOO.COM (12/14/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS LX-i (12/14/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... KELLIEFITTON_at_YAHOO.COM (12/13/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: Cobol's hanging by a thread... James J. Gavan (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/13/04)
• Cobol's hanging by a thread... KELLIEFITTON_at_YAHOO.COM (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL Tom Morrison (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails steve.t (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/13/04)
• Re: Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails Richard (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Peter Lacey (12/13/04)
• Fujitsu V4 (COBOL97) - Build Fails steve.t (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/13/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? mosnar (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• OT:Insurance WAS Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/13/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/12/04)
• Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/12/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/12/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL James J. Gavan (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes LX-i (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes LX-i (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/12/04)
• Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/12/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Frederico Fonseca (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/12/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Joe Zitzelberger (12/12/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL (LONG with sample code) Pete Dashwood (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/12/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/12/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/12/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/11/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL Frederico Fonseca (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes LX-i (12/11/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL Buck Black (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes LX-i (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS LX-i (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes LX-i (12/11/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL Richard (12/11/04)
• Re: SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL Frederico Fonseca (12/11/04)
• SCREEN SECTION processing in RM/COBOL Buck Black (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Lueko Willms (12/11/04)
• Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS SkippyPB (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Joe Zitzelberger (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/11/04)
• Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Frederico Fonseca (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Lueko Willms (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/11/04)
• COBOL FAQ William M Klein (12/11/04)
• Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? David Essex (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/11/04)
• Re: PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/11/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/11/04)
• Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? clvrmnky (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Michael Wojcik (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• PC COBOL Environment - WAS : MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS LX-i (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Donald Tees (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Joe Zitzelberger (12/10/04)
• Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? Joe Zitzelberger (12/10/04)
• Re: Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? Joe Zitzelberger (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes SkippyPB (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Frederico Fonseca (12/10/04)
• Is there a COBOL for Apple Mac? Lueko Willms (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Joe Zitzelberger (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Joe Zitzelberger (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Peter Lacey (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Rick Smith (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/10/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Donald Tees (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS James J. Gavan (12/10/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Frederico Fonseca (12/10/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/10/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/10/04)
• Re: Style - OO vs User-Defined Functions Pete Dashwood (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Donald Tees (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Work with vb objects in Acucobol Top94 (12/09/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/09/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Richard (12/09/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• Re: Semaphore failure. Rerun as root Bill Yarnall (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Frederico Fonseca (12/09/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Michael Wojcik (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Michael Wojcik (12/09/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? JerryMouse (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/09/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/09/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Joe Zitzelberger (12/09/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Joe Zitzelberger (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/09/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• PLUG: txt2pdf 7.6 mail_at_sanface.com (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/09/04)
• Re: Style - OO vs User-Defined Functions James J. Gavan (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: Style - OO vs User-Defined Functions LX-i (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS LX-i (12/09/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K LX-i (12/09/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions LX-i (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: ASLM: Semaphore failure. Rerun as root Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• Re: Mainframe Integration Architect Need - US - MA docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/09/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Lueko Willms (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/09/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/09/04)
• Style - OO vs User-Defined Functions William M. Klein (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions James J. Gavan (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions William M. Klein (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions James J. Gavan (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/08/04)
• Mainframe Integration Architect Need - US - MA Ace (12/08/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: ASLM: Semaphore failure. Rerun as root James J. Gavan (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• ASLM: Semaphore failure. Rerun as root vic_at_summerseas.com (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions James J. Gavan (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions William M. Klein (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/08/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? James J. Gavan (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! James J. Gavan (12/08/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Peter Lacey (12/08/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Lueko Willms (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• 123 Just Me! (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes SkippyPB (12/08/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Donald Tees (12/08/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? JerryMouse (12/08/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K JerryMouse (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! JerryMouse (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! JerryMouse (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! JerryMouse (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions JerryMouse (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! Tukla Ratte (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/08/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K steve.t (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Don Leahy (12/08/04)
• Re: Fortress COBOL - some conclusions LX-i (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS LX-i (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Donald Tees (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions William M. Klein (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Donald Tees (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/08/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K steve.t (12/08/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K steve.t (12/08/04)
• Re: Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer William M. Klein (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/08/04)
• Re: Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer Joe Zitzelberger (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/08/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/08/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/08/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Richard (12/08/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/07/04)
• Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/07/04)
• Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/07/04)
• Using FUNCTION-ID to create user-defined functions Chris (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS epc8_at_juno.com (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Michael Wojcik (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Michael Wojcik (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Alternatives to Pan Valet for Blind Programmer JGH (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/07/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Rick Smith (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Peter Lacey (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Jeff York (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Donald Tees (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Joe Zitzelberger (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: Fortress COBOL - some conclusions Tukla Ratte (12/07/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K JerryMouse (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS epc8_at_juno.com (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS epc8_at_juno.com (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! JerryMouse (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics Lueko Willms (12/07/04)
• Re: Fortress COBOL - some conclusions Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Lueko Willms (12/07/04)
• Re: OT - Take that Linux! Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Pete Dashwood (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Arnold Trembley (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Arnold Trembley (12/07/04)
• Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? mosnar (12/07/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? steve.t (12/07/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? steve.t (12/07/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? steve.t (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/07/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K steve.t (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics steve.t (12/07/04)
• Re: MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Donald Tees (12/07/04)
• Re: Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• MAINFRAME SHOP STANDARDS Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Old COBOL application with errors.....any help? mosnar (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics LX-i (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/07/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/07/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Wiggy (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/07/04)
• OT Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/07/04)
• Re: OT Brooklyn Bridge defense (was: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/07/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K JerryMouse (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/06/04)
• Sections, Paragraphs, and related topics William M. Klein (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Donald Tees (12/06/04)
• Re: OT Brooklyn Bridge defense (was: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Donald Tees (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Donald Tees (12/06/04)
• Re: OT Brooklyn Bridge defense James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Peter Lacey (12/06/04)
• Somebody have the disquette for the books :"PROGRAMMER EN COBOL ANS 85" S62 (12/06/04)
• OT - Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• OT Brooklyn Bridge defense (was: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K William M. Klein (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K steve.t (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: Languages James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Michael Wojcik (12/06/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 William M. Klein (12/06/04)
• Re: Languages Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: Languages James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Michael Wojcik (12/06/04)
• Free Format (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits) Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: Fortress COBOL - a spam advertisement Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Free Format (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits) Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Free format (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• OT - Take that Linux! JerryMouse (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K JerryMouse (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: Marriage and the family Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Fortress COBOL - some conclusions Howard Brazee (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Re: Output file passed to Davox where money field appears incorrect. carlos_avalos1_at_yahoo.com (12/06/04)
• Re: University of Washington COBOL positions docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Donald Tees (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Donald Tees (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Lueko Willms (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Richard (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/06/04)
• Re: Languages Arnold Trembley (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Error in Build with FJ 4.0 under W/2K Steve Thompson (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Wiggy (12/06/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Joe Zitzelberger (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/06/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/06/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Languages (was: Program templates as Object Classes) Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Richard (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/05/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Richard (12/05/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/05/04)
• Re: MicroFocus C-Isam Index Rebuild 9/037 Richard (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/05/04)
• Re: MicroFocus C-Isam Index Rebuild 9/037 Charles W. Cribbs II (12/05/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Donald Tees (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Vindication of SECTION (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits) Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• MF cobol compilation error on HP Itanium 11.23 Muralidhar (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• OT: Collections in COBOL standard WAS Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/05/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/05/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• MicroFocus C-Isam Index Rebuild 9/037 Jonathan (12/05/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/05/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/05/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Free format Lueko Willms (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/04/04)
• Free format (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/04/04)
• OPTINIONS challenged (was: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/04/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers Alistair Maclean (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Lueko Willms (12/04/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Robert Jones (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/04/04)
• Re: website hosting Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• COBOL Standards (follow-on note 1 of ???) William M. Klein (12/04/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/04/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers James J. Gavan (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/04/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/04/04)
• Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: website hosting LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/04/04)
• Re: OT: Marriage and the family LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni Pete Dashwood (12/04/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/04/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers Pete Dashwood (12/04/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Pete Dashwood (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Frank Swarbrick (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? JerryMouse (12/04/04)
• Re: OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/04/04)
• OT Science versus religion: Is compromise impossible? Pete Dashwood (12/04/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/04/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers Alistair Maclean (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/04/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description Lueko Willms (12/03/04)
• Re: FBI turned AMERICA into a NATION of PROGRAMMED SLAVES and ROBOTS Qolin (12/03/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni Lueko Willms (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/03/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/03/04)
• Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/03/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits LX-i (12/03/04)
• Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person Ian Dalziel (12/03/04)
• Re: Compile option Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: Compile option William M. Klein (12/03/04)
• Re: Compile option Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/03/04)
• Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) Frederico Fonseca (12/03/04)
• Re: Compile option William M. Klein (12/03/04)
• Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: OT : Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: Compile option Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person Hannah (12/03/04)
• Compile option Howard Brazee (12/03/04)
• Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) Euromercante (12/03/04)
• Re: OT : Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/03/04)
• Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... Richard (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/03/04)
• OT : Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/03/04)
• Re: COBOL III S Comstock (12/03/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/03/04)
• Re: website hosting Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/03/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/03/04)
• Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... LX-i (12/03/04)
• Re: website hosting LX-i (12/03/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages LX-i (12/03/04)
• Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE LX-i (12/03/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/03/04)
• Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. Richard (12/03/04)
• Re: OT: Marriage and the family Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Chuck Stevens (12/02/04)
• Re: Is COBOL being widely used? (Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE) Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Howard Brazee (12/02/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person R.Freitag (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/02/04)
• Re: Calling An Interactive Editor From COBOL Application Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/02/04)
• Looking for a part time JCL/COBOL person Hannah (12/02/04)
• Re: OT: Marriage and the family Howard Brazee (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: OT: Marriage and the family LX-i (12/02/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: MF Isam problems LX-i (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. E P Chandler (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) Frederico Fonseca (12/02/04)
• Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. Anthony Dilworth (12/02/04)
• Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. Anthony Dilworth (12/02/04)
• Calling An Interactive Editor From COBOL Application Chris (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Howard Brazee (12/02/04)
• Re: Program templates as Object Classes Karl Kiesel (12/02/04)
• Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) Euromercante (12/02/04)
• Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/02/04)
• Re: Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network renfrewthejust_at_yahoo.com (12/02/04)
• Re: Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. JerryMouse (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/02/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptioni Lueko Willms (12/02/04)
• Horrible, Horrible, Horrible. foodman123_at_aol.com (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data descriptionin programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Arnold Trembley (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Arnold Trembley (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits William M. Klein (12/02/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator Lueko Willms (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al William M. Klein (12/02/04)
• Re: Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network James J. Gavan (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Warren Simmons (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Robert Wagner (12/02/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Robert Wagner (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Donald Tees (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Donald Tees (12/02/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/02/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Robert Wagner (12/02/04)
• Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Frank Swarbrick (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Michael Mattias (12/02/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/02/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/02/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Michael Wojcik (12/01/04)
• Re: Problems Opening Excel Sheet in 2003 ( Fujitsu PowerCobol 6.1) Robert Wagner (12/01/04)
• Re: Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network Thomas A. Li (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Howard Brazee (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator Lueko Willms (12/01/04)
• Re: Is COBOL being widely used? (Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE) Lueko Willms (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/01/04)
• Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... Howard Brazee (12/01/04)
• Mouse traps in NE on a Novell network Renfrew (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator Thomas A. Li (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator Thomas A. Li (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Howard Brazee (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Howard Brazee (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Howard Brazee (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/01/04)
• Re: Is COBOL being widely used? (Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE) Richard (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Michael Wojcik (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al William M. Klein (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Michael Wojcik (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Warren Simmons (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Warren Simmons (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Warren Simmons (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Warren Simmons (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator Lueko Willms (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers Alistair Maclean (12/01/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers Alistair Maclean (12/01/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Joe Zitzelberger (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Alistair Maclean (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Joe Zitzelberger (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Alistair Maclean (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Alistair Maclean (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE Lueko Willms (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Lueko Willms (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Jeff York (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: need new Cobol Cheesle (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol compiler for cross plattform (WinXP/zOS) development Cheesle (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: Cobol2Java 2.0 --- COBOL to Java Source Code Translator Lueko Willms (12/01/04)
• Re: matt parker is guilty of illegal people trafficking and will be prosecuted http://tinyurl.com/6kmea (12/01/04)
• Is COBOL being widely used? (Re: COMPUTE vs MOVE) Lueko Willms (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Arnold Trembley (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/01/04)
• IBM, CICS, COBOL, et al William M. Klein (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Richard (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits James J. Gavan (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages James J. Gavan (12/01/04)
• Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Warren Simmons (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages docdwarf_at_panix.com (12/01/04)
• Re: Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Richard (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Chuck Stevens (12/01/04)
• Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Robert Wagner (12/01/04)
• Re: Need help with REDEFINES (I think).... Robert Wagner (12/01/04)
• Re: Is COMP ITEMS BETTER THAN COMP3 ITEMS IN MEMORY USAGE? Robert Wagner (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: OT: demise of COBOL WAS: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Some OO design principles WAS Re: Differences in data description in programming languages Pete Dashwood (12/01/04)
• Re: slightly OT: Project Managers James J. Gavan (11/30/04)
• Re: Seeking Testing Volunteers W2K MTS/DTC to VMS DECdtm Distributed 2PC Transactions Richard Maher (11/30/04)

Last message date: 12/31/04
Archived on: 12/31/04 CET

---

1363 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]