Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?...
From: William M. Klein (wmklein_at_nospam.netcom.com)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: Ron: "Re: Help with research"
- Previous message: William M. Klein: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- Next in thread: Richard: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- Reply: Richard: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:53:32 GMT
"Richard" <riplin@Azonic.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1108589970.105316.216170@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> I think Cobol language have the power, knowledge and more
>> than 40 years of real-world experience, to circumvent all the
>> problems and the limitations, of the way that C or C++ uses
>> expressions in function calls.
>
> Please explain how Cobol could 'circumvent all the problems and the
> limitations' while actually using expressions that include CALL ...
> RETURNING ...
>
See my separate note on the support in both Micro Focus and the ISO 2002
Standard for arithmetic expressions in BY CONTENT and BY VALUE phrases - when
CALL prototypes are used.
"Obviously" these cannot be used in the RETURNING or BY REFERENCE phrases.
-- Bill Klein wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
- Next message: Ron: "Re: Help with research"
- Previous message: William M. Klein: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- Next in thread: Richard: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- Reply: Richard: "Re: May I introduce myself to cobol?..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|