Re: Aircraft safety
From: Rick Smith (ricksmith_at_mfi.net)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: James J. Gavan: "Re: OT: Religion in CLC posts WAS: Re: MF Collection Class speed"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: OT: Religion in CLC posts WAS: Re: MF Collection Class speed"
- In reply to: James J. Gavan: "Re: Aircraft safety"
- Next in thread: James J. Gavan: "Re: Aircraft safety"
- Reply: James J. Gavan: "Re: Aircraft safety"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:46:34 -0500
"James J. Gavan" <jgavandeletethis@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:OjJVd.564541$8l.533130@pd7tw1no...
[snip]
> We accept there is a loss of life in war. Just like bombers were
> vulnerable during WW2, no matter what fighter coverage was provided.
< http://www.acepilots.com/usaaf_tusk.html >
-----------------
The combat record of the Tuskegee Airmen speaks for itself:
...
NO bombers lost while being escorted by the 332nd, a unique achievement
...
-----------------
- Next message: James J. Gavan: "Re: OT: Religion in CLC posts WAS: Re: MF Collection Class speed"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: OT: Religion in CLC posts WAS: Re: MF Collection Class speed"
- In reply to: James J. Gavan: "Re: Aircraft safety"
- Next in thread: James J. Gavan: "Re: Aircraft safety"
- Reply: James J. Gavan: "Re: Aircraft safety"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|