Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
From: jce (defaultuser_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Previous message: jce: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- In reply to: LX-i: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Next in thread: Lueko Willms: "Re: OT - Basic human rights (was: "lie" vs "error")"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:20:48 GMT
"LX-i" <lxi0007@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:ac289$424381b9$45491f85$23919@KNOLOGY.NET...
> James J. Gavan wrote:
>> LX-i wrote:
> Does someone without "health care" mean that the government should get
> involved? I'm of the belief that *most* folks without "health care" are
> without it due to the choices they have made in their life - and,
> conversely, those who "have it" are also there due to the choices they
> have made in their lives. Rewarding irresponsible behavior with free
> money (or health care, or whatever) only encourages irresponsibility.
Yes, it's a shame when you choose to be born to poor parents.
JCE
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Previous message: jce: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- In reply to: LX-i: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Next in thread: Lueko Willms: "Re: OT - Basic human rights (was: "lie" vs "error")"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]