Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)
From: LX-i (lxi0007_at_netscape.net)
Date: 03/26/05
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: OT: US Presidents and Foreign Policy"
- Previous message: HeyBub: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Next in thread: Frederico Fonseca: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: Frederico Fonseca: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: epc8_at_juno.com: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: James J. Gavan: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: Pete Dashwood: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: Binyamin Dissen: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:02:14 -0600
Good afternoon.
The project on which I'm currently working involves handling messages
coming from an interface partner. Due to the protocol of the interface,
they can only send up to 3,000 characters or so per message; so, they
often send us multiple responses that comprise a single logical message.
My design is to move them into a table, appending until we get the
last one, and then sending the message, as a single message, to the
user. This part is fine.
My question is this. It's a mainframe environment, and though most all
of our users have been directed to use the GUI (whose outputs we already
put in another table, then send them a web page with the entire output),
we still have about 10% of our users that are allowed to use the
terminal emulator user interface. For these, we put their outputs in a
"paging file." We then have a program (called GAG) that retrieves these
messages, a screenful of text at a time. (It will also print them,
delete them, etc.)
My question (or topic for discussion, more aptly) is this - how do you
handle outputs that need to be "paged"? Do you use a similar
system-provided file? A database table? Punched tape? ;) I'm just
trying to get a sense of whether the direction I'm going is the same
direction that others in the industry have gone.
Thanks... :)
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ / \ / ~ Live from Montgomery, AL! ~ ~ / \/ o ~ ~ ~ / /\ - | ~ daniel@thebelowdomain ~ ~ _____ / \ | ~ http://www.djs-consulting.com ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GEEKCODE 3.12 GCS/IT d s-:+ a C++ L++ E--- W++ N++ o? K- w$ ~ ~ !O M-- V PS+ PE++ Y? !PGP t+ 5? X+ R* tv b+ DI++ D+ G- e ~ ~ h---- r+++ z++++ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: OT: US Presidents and Foreign Policy"
- Previous message: HeyBub: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Next in thread: Frederico Fonseca: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: Frederico Fonseca: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: epc8_at_juno.com: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: James J. Gavan: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: Pete Dashwood: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Reply: Binyamin Dissen: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|