Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: Howard Brazee: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Previous message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- In reply to: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Mar 2005 09:08:05 -0500
In article <joe_zitzelberger-D19F9F.09030228032005@ispnews.usenetserver.com>,
Joe Zitzelberger <joe_zitzelberger@nospam.com> wrote:
>In article <d27ong$5k2$1@panix5.panix.com>, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
[snip]
>> Gracious of you to admit that. I consider the matter closed, then.
>
>I would be quite happy to close it with a single dangling question -- we
>have strong evidence that many people believe that 'social security is
>not a tax, but an investment in ones retirement'. What hypothesis do
>you propose to explain the source of this belief?
I barely know what *I* believe, let alone other people; you might ask one
of the adherents about their foundations.
DD
- Next message: Howard Brazee: "Re: Handling outputs (yes, an *on* topic thread!)"
- Previous message: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- In reply to: Joe Zitzelberger: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: OT - "lie" vs "error""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|