Re: OT - yet another OT thread

James J. Gavan wrote:
> Yeah, unresolved. (You read what you want to read Daniel).
>
> 1 - "We've looked and to date we've found nothing to say Yea or Nay".
> 2 - "Got tricky out there because of security, so we called it quits".
> 3 - "Not to worry, we'll get back in there when the security is
> tightened up and then we'll do some more looking. Somewhere, somehow
> in the future, we'll be able to say to you, 'There you go ! We told
> you the *** had WMDs', ".
>
> Question - How long is the WORLD supposed to wait for that
> verification - perhaps until the Texans see that the Saudi oilfields
> have dried up ?
> Not to worry, we have the second largest reserve up here, after the
> Saudis, in the Athabasca Tar sands, way, way north of Edmonton, and
> the Tar sands are the size of Florida.

Read today that the Canadian government is so f*ed that it is not
unreasonable to see a breakup in the near future. The way I recall the
story, Quebec becomes a stand-alone country, provinces to the east remain
Canada, provinces to the west join the United States.

Then those tar sands that once were yours become ours.




.

Quantcast