Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- From: Peter Lacey <lacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:22:19 -0500
LX-i wrote:
> > Think of the implications of such a tripartite pact on US foreign
> > policy. Not only the Chinese are direct competitors thirsting for oil,
> > but the newcomer is also India.
>
> I agree, it's something to be considered. Makes it even more important
> that we get some oil sources and refining capacity in this country ASAP,
> before the supply pinch really puts the screws to us.
The supply of petroleum is a constraint, or bottleneck, in the economic
lfe of the country. Getting some oil sources and refining capacity
won't remove that status. Increasing the capacity of a bottleneck does
not fix the problem: it just makes it more acute (because the demand on
the bottleneck will increase). The ONLY permanent way to handle
bottlenecks is to offload demand from them - to find another way to
accomplish the same function. There's a book called "The Goal" by
Goldratt & Cox which explains and demonstrates this in very
straightforward terms. It should be required reading for every
educated adult.
PL
.
- References:
- OT - yet another OT thread
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- From: LX-i
- Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- From: James J. Gavan
- Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- From: LX-i
- Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- From: James J. Gavan
- Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- From: LX-i
- OT - yet another OT thread
- Prev by Date: Re: convert packed CHAR to unpacked DIGIT
- Next by Date: Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- Next by thread: Re: OT - yet another OT thread
- Index(es):