comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How to stop UDP port 86 BroadCast
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Russell
• SEARCH ALL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: nowhere
• Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: Mainframe "murph" program
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• convert from rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• How to stop UDP port 86 BroadCast
  • From: MalhiNet
• AcuCobol and DLL
  • From: BM
• Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2
  • From: Theo
• Re: screenio and web development?
  • From: Richard
• Re: screenio and web development?
  • From: dfeng
• Re: Has anyone notiiced that Thane is "fixin" to be a Daddy?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: cooking pots
  • From: El Pistolero
• Has anyone notiiced that Thane is "fixin" to be a Daddy?
  • From: El Pistolero
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Mainframe "murph" program
  • From: David Roser
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: One for The Ages
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: OT: cooking pots
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: epc8
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: epc8
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: GeneralBullmoose
• Re: OT: cooking pots
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: cooking pots
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Mainframe Architect position-Indianapolis
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Mainframe Architect position-Indianapolis
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Outsourcing Software In India
  • From: Clark Morris
• Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?
  • From: epc8
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Russell
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: GeneralBullmoose
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Russell
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard Maher
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Wiggy
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Wiggy
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Dumb "figurative constant" rules
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: Richard
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: Richard
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Simon Tobias
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Linking Problem
  • From: hdumoulin
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: GeneralBullmoose
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Use of FlexCell Grid Control in Fujitsu Power Cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: docdwarf
• linkage section
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Walter Murray
• Use of FlexCell Grid Control in Fujitsu Power Cobol
  • From: Alan Warren
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: DTS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: DTS
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• DTS
  • From: Kelly
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: COBOL and exceptions (was: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• COBOL and exceptions (was: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: GeneralBullmoose
• Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard
• In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition
  • From: GeneralBullmoose
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Russell
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard Maher
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Walter Murray
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL
  • From: CG
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: CG
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Kevin Solomon
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Kevin Solomon
• Money Movers Inc. project
  • From: mail
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: output question
  • From: JJ
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: CG
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: Richard
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: Richard
• Re: output question
  • From: funarcade
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard Maher
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: James Johnson
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard Maher
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: Richard
• compatible compiler with microfocus
  • From: happy
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2
  • From: Richard
• Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: Matt
• Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: output question
  • From: Richard
• Re: output question
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: output question
  • From: Rick Smith
• output question
  • From: funarcade
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• A JC teaching IBM skills
  • From: Matt
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: ribjo
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: ribjo
• Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: The world is really unstable these days......
  • From: Robert Wagner
• Re: Outsourcing Software In India
  • From: Robert Wagner
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: screenio and web development?
  • From: Tony Mina
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: Richard
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Michael Russell
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: MS COBOL 5.0
  • From: Richard
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: William M. Klein
• MS COBOL 5.0
  • From: Gys Els
• Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: ribjo
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Richard Maher
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL
  • From: ribjopabra@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Outsourcing Software In India
  • From: Jeff
• Re: screenio and web development?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• screenio and web development?
  • From: dfeng
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton
  • From: Mike
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] USAF & Melbourne
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: The world is really unstable these days......
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Screen descriptions in HP Cobol on VMS
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call
  • From: Richard
• Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: The world is really unstable these days......
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The world is really unstable these days......
  • From: JCE
• Re: [OT] USAF & Melbourne
  • From: JCE
• Re: USAF & Melbourne
  • From: Richard
• [OT] USAF & Melbourne
  • From: LX-i
• Re: support finding a compiler
  • From: Wiggy
• support finding a compiler
  • From: happy
• wang migration, pace conversion
  • From: sudarshan
• Re: IBM WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0
  • From: epc8
• IBM WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Harvesters Are Back
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Harvesters Are Back
  • From: HeyBub
• [OT] Harvesters Are Back
  • From: docdwarf
• Book: Java for S/390 & AS/400 COBOL Programmers
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: JCE
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Open UNIX Command Line From Within MF Server Express
  • From: Chris
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Cobol grammar and language syntax
  • From: Khamis Abuelkomboz
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: cobol12
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: cobol12
  • From: epc8
• Re: cobol12
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: cobol12
  • From: epc8
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: El Pistolero
• Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD
  • From: ps
• Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD
  • From: ramzenit
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD
  • From: ramzenit
• Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD
  • From: Robert Jones
• liant relativity not work on XP SP2
  • From: ramzenit
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Email with attachments using IEBGENER
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: The Irish Problem
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: The Irish Problem
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The Irish Problem
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: mark
• Re: The Irish Problem
  • From: dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: JCL Builder or script HELP
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: JCL Builder or script HELP
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: LX-i
• Re: JCL Builder or script HELP
  • From: Raul
• Re: JCL Builder or script HELP
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men (Thanks to all for info on Linux)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: JCL Builder or script HELP
  • From: epc8
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• JCL Builder or script HELP
  • From: Raul
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: cobol12
  • From: epc8
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: The Irish Problem
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: LX-i
• Re: cobol12
  • From: epc8
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Jeff Lanam
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: cobol12
  • From: Richard
• cobol12
  • From: John Sampson
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: mnews
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Richard
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Richard
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Richard
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Linux and Windows - installationa and tolleratin (was: Of mice and men
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: epc8
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: mnews
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Error
  • From: G. Ferraro
• Re: Error
  • From: Richard
• Error
  • From: G. Ferraro
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Fujitsu Cobol Error- Exception in page error
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Don Leahy
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Fujitsu Cobol Error- Exception in page error
  • From: mvalecruz5@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Email with attachments using IEBGENER
  • From: kathie
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The Humanity
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CompaqCobol (VMS)
  • From: Don Braffitt
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can people code only in COBOL was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: jce
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: jce
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: The Humanity
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: The Humanity
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: Andreas Lerch
• Re: The Humanity
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• The Humanity
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• OT or OT, that is the question.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Evolution or Creation of Programming Language Names (Was: OT - "lie" vs "error")
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Can people code only in COBOL was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT - Top-Posting
  • From: Lueko Willms
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Richard
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Of mice and men
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: Clark F. Morris, Jr.
• Re: IBM Help
  • From: Fred Exley
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Richard
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Can people code only in COBOL was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Clark F. Morris, Jr.
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Clark F. Morris, Jr.
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Clark F. Morris, Jr.
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Clark F. Morris, Jr.
• Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Richard
• Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Net Express 4
  • From: Richard
• Re: SORT - Internal vs External (was: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Micro Focus Cobol / 2 Workbench For Sale
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Net Express 4
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: OT - yet another OT thread
  • From: James J. Gavan
• SORT - Internal vs External (was: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Net Express 4
  • From: mark
• OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Evolution or Creation of Programming Language Names (Was: OT - "lie" vs "error")
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: IBM Help
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Evolution or Creation of Programming Language Names (Was: OT - "lie" vs "error")
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files
  • From: JRDuval
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: jce
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: jce
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: jce
• Re: OT - yet another OT thread
  • From: jce
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: jce
• Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?...
  • From: jce
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT - "lie" vs "error"
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT - yet another OT thread
  • From: James J. Gavan

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(16)