Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
- From: clvrmnky <clvrmnky-uunet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:59:02 -0400
My review of available literature seems to indicate that COBOL-85 does
not support the notion of dynamic memory. That is, there is no standard
malloc or calloc style keywords or calls I can make to allocate and grow
a hunk of memory for an application.
I've got a simple buffer I want to be able to hold a significant amount
of data if necessary (say, 64k) but is often asked to just hold a few
hundred bytes.
I've seen that the latest ANSI/ISO standard for COBOL has the notion of
a pointer into a reserved chunk of memory, and obviously I could
implement my own "heap" for the whole program. The program is pretty
simple, though, so the only heap I might use is the fixed size of the
field anyway.
I'm just a bit concerned that my app (though short-running) grabs such a
large chunk of memory that it only uses a fraction of normally. I'm
also sort of stuck with passing the data (what I call a response) in a
data field (and not, for example, in file) because my app is a bit of
glue between a Java server and something else.
That "something else" is up to the customer, and I've provided a
copybook for them to get at the response via procedures in the glue app.
The notion is to provide controlled access to our Java server from
COBOL applications.
In retrospect I suppose I _can_ write out to a short-live "file" of some
manner, and pass a "handle" or reference to that file. Would this be
the correct COBOL way for such an application? I know nothing of files
on mainframes, but I'm a pretty smart guy and can figure this stuff out.
My main concern is that I want to ensure that the same code will work
fairly easily with a number of mainframe environments. Right now we
target OS/390 on zOS, but conceivably we could end up supporting almost
any COBOL-enabled system.
Thanks.
-- cm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
- From: Chuck Stevens
- Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
- From: nowhere
- Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
- Prev by Date: Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
- Next by Date: Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
- Previous by thread: convert from rmcobol
- Next by thread: Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|