comp.lang.cobol

Date Index

Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields, clvrmnky
- Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields, nowhere
- Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields, Chuck Stevens
  - Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields, William M. Klein
- Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields, William M. Klein
convert from rmcobol, Maurizio Giacobbe
- Re: convert from rmcobol, Frederico Fonseca
  - Re: convert from rmcobol, Maurizio Giacobbe
    - Re: convert from rmcobol, Frederico Fonseca
    - Re: convert from rmcobol, Maurizio Giacobbe
How to stop UDP port 86 BroadCast, MalhiNet
- Re: How to stop UDP port 86 BroadCast, Michael Wojcik
AcuCobol and DLL, BM
Has anyone notiiced that Thane is "fixin" to be a Daddy?, El Pistolero
- Re: Has anyone notiiced that Thane is "fixin" to be a Daddy?, HeyBub
Mainframe "murph" program, David Roser
- Re: Mainframe "murph" program, Clark Morris
Re: One for The Ages, Sparky Spartacus
Re: OT: cooking pots, Sparky Spartacus
- Re: OT: cooking pots, docdwarf
  - Re: OT: cooking pots, Sparky Spartacus
- Re: OT: cooking pots, El Pistolero
Re: Mainframe Architect position-Indianapolis, Sparky Spartacus
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Mainframe Architect position-Indianapolis, Sparky Spartacus
Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, epc8
- Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, Chuck Stevens
  - Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, Chuck Stevens
- Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, Chuck Stevens
  - Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, epc8
  - Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, epc8
    - Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, Jeff York
    - Re: Where are spaces required in COBOL source code?, Chuck Stevens
Dumb "figurative constant" rules, William M. Klein
Linking Problem, hdumoulin
- Re: Linking Problem, Simon Tobias
- Re: Linking Problem, Richard
  - Re: Linking Problem, William M. Klein
  - Re: Linking Problem, Wiggy
    - Re: Linking Problem, Richard
    - Re: Linking Problem, Richard
    - Re: Linking Problem, Wiggy
    - Re: Linking Problem, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Linking Problem, Richard
    - Re: Linking Problem, Russell
    - Re: Linking Problem, Richard
    - Re: Linking Problem, Russell
    - Re: Linking Problem, Richard
    - Re: Linking Problem, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Linking Problem, Russell
linkage section, Maurizio Giacobbe
Use of FlexCell Grid Control in Fujitsu Power Cobol, Alan Warren
- Re: Use of FlexCell Grid Control in Fujitsu Power Cobol, Pete Dashwood
DTS, Kelly
- Re: DTS, Frederico Fonseca
- Re: DTS, Richard
In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, GeneralBullmoose
- Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, William M. Klein
  - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, GeneralBullmoose
- Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, HeyBub
- Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, Richard
  - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, GeneralBullmoose
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, Richard
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, William M. Klein
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, Richard
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, GeneralBullmoose
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, docdwarf
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, GeneralBullmoose
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, docdwarf
    - Re: In Cobol, large amount of spaces between records due to variable definition, HeyBub
Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Walter Murray
- Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Chuck Stevens
- Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, William M. Klein
  - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, William M. Klein
    - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Chuck Stevens
    - COBOL and exceptions (was: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, William M. Klein
    - Re: COBOL and exceptions (was: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Howard Brazee
- Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, HeyBub
  - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Walter Murray
  - Re: Passing an invalid date to INTEGER-OF-DATE, Chuck Stevens
Occurs Depending Memory Use, Kevin Solomon
- Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Michael Mattias
- Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Frederico Fonseca
- Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
  - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Chuck Stevens
  - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Kevin Solomon
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, docdwarf
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, HeyBub
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Sparky Spartacus
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Russell
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, LX-i
- Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, HeyBub
- Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, CG
- Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard Maher
- Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, William M. Klein
  - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, William M. Klein
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Frederico Fonseca
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Frederico Fonseca
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Michael Mattias
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Sparky Spartacus
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Frederico Fonseca
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Frederico Fonseca
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, William M. Klein
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Scott Peterson
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Frederico Fonseca
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Robert Jones
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard Maher
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Scott Peterson
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Scott Peterson
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Scott Peterson
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Scott Peterson
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Chuck Stevens
    - SEARCH ALL, Howard Brazee
    - Re: SEARCH ALL, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: SEARCH ALL, Howard Brazee
    - Re: SEARCH ALL, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: SEARCH ALL, Michael Mattias
    - Re: SEARCH ALL, Howard Brazee
    - Re: SEARCH ALL, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Michael Mattias
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, William M. Klein
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, docdwarf
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Sparky Spartacus
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Sparky Spartacus
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, William M. Klein
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Richard
    - Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use, Sparky Spartacus
Money Movers Inc. project, mail
compatible compiler with microfocus, happy
- Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, Richard
- Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, Michael Mattias
  - Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, Jeff York
  - Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, Richard
    - Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, docdwarf
    - Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, Richard
    - Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, docdwarf
- Re: compatible compiler with microfocus, Colin Campbell
Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2, Richard
- Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2, HeyBub
- Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL and winXP SP2, Theo
output question, funarcade
- Re: output question, Rick Smith
- Re: output question, Howard Brazee
- Re: output question, Richard
  - Re: output question, funarcade
    - Re: output question, JJ
A JC teaching IBM skills, Matt
- Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, docdwarf
  - Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, Pete Dashwood
  - Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, Matt
  - Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, Rick Smith
    - Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, Jeff York
    - Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, docdwarf
    - Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, HeyBub
    - Re: A JC teaching IBM skills, Kelly Bert Manning
Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, beliavsky
- Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Richard
  - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Clark Morris
    - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, William M. Klein
    - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, Chuck Stevens
- Re: Cobol history question -- lawsuit against standards committee, William M. Klein
MS COBOL 5.0, Gys Els
- Re: MS COBOL 5.0, Richard
IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, ribjopabra@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Chuck Stevens
- Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, docdwarf
- Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard Maher
  - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, ribjo
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, ribjo
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard
- Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, William M. Klein
  - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Michael Mattias
  - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, ribjo
- Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Colin Campbell
  - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard Maher
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Michael Mattias
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, docdwarf
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard Maher
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Michael Mattias
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Arnold Trembley
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Michael Mattias
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Sparky Spartacus
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, docdwarf
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Michael Mattias
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, docdwarf
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Michael Mattias
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, docdwarf
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Sparky Spartacus
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, docdwarf
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, CG
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, William M. Klein
    - Message not available
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, Richard
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, docdwarf
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model amd COBOL, William M. Klein
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL, Colin Campbell
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL, Scott Peterson
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL, CG
    - Re: IBM S/390 memory model and COBOL, Sparky Spartacus
Re: Outsourcing Software In India, Jeff
- Re: Outsourcing Software In India, Robert Wagner
  - Re: Outsourcing Software In India, Clark Morris
screenio and web development?, dfeng
- Re: screenio and web development?, Richard
- Re: screenio and web development?, Tony Mina
  - Re: screenio and web development?, dfeng
    - Re: screenio and web development?, Richard
[OT] Question for Kellie Fitton, Mike
- Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton, Peter Lacey
  - Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton, Peter Lacey
    - Re: Question for Kellie Fitton, Richard
    - Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton, docdwarf
    - Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: [OT] Question for Kellie Fitton, Chuck Stevens
Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
- Message not available
  - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Robert Jones
  - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., William M. Klein
    - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., William M. Klein
    - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Michael Russell
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
  - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., William M. Klein
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Howard Brazee
- Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., docdwarf
- Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., HeyBub
- Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Pete Dashwood
  - Message not available
    - Re: Should COBOL be lockedUP for good?..., Richard
Re: Screen descriptions in HP Cobol on VMS, William M. Klein
Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call, clvrmnky
- Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call, Richard
  - Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call, clvrmnky
- Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call, William M. Klein
  - Re: Need sanity check on return from EZASOKET call, clvrmnky
Re: The world is really unstable these days......, JCE
- Re: The world is really unstable these days......, Pete Dashwood
- Re: The world is really unstable these days......, HeyBub
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The world is really unstable these days......, Robert Wagner
[OT] USAF & Melbourne, LX-i
- Re: USAF & Melbourne, Richard
- Re: [OT] USAF & Melbourne, JCE
- Re: [OT] USAF & Melbourne, HeyBub
support finding a compiler, happy
- Re: support finding a compiler, Wiggy
wang migration, pace conversion, sudarshan
IBM WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0, William M. Klein
- Re: IBM WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0, epc8
  - Re: IBM WebSphere Developer for zSeries V6.0, Pete Dashwood
[OT] Harvesters Are Back, docdwarf
- Re: [OT] Harvesters Are Back, HeyBub
  - Re: [OT] Harvesters Are Back, docdwarf
Book: Java for S/390 & AS/400 COBOL Programmers, HeyBub
Open UNIX Command Line From Within MF Server Express, Chris
Cobol grammar and language syntax, Khamis Abuelkomboz
Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD, Robert Jones
- Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD, ramzenit
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD, Pete Dashwood
  - Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD, ramzenit
    - Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD, ps
    - Re: DBACCESS POWERCOBOL AND NUMERIC FIELD, Pete Dashwood
liant relativity not work on XP SP2, ramzenit
JCL Builder or script HELP, Raul
- Re: JCL Builder or script HELP, epc8
- Re: JCL Builder or script HELP, Colin Campbell
  - Re: JCL Builder or script HELP, Raul
- Re: JCL Builder or script HELP, jce
- Re: JCL Builder or script HELP, docdwarf
Re: The Irish Problem, James J. Gavan
- Re: The Irish Problem, dashwood
  - Re: The Irish Problem, docdwarf
    - Re: The Irish Problem, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: The Irish Problem, docdwarf
cobol12, John Sampson
- Re: cobol12, Richard
  - Re: cobol12, epc8
- Re: cobol12, epc8
  - Re: cobol12, epc8
    - Re: cobol12, William M. Klein
    - Re: cobol12, epc8
    - Re: cobol12, Chuck Stevens
Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, HeyBub
- Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, mnews
  - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Michael Mattias
  - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, docdwarf
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, epc8
  - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Chuck Stevens
- Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Richard
- Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Richard
  - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, William M. Klein
    - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Donald Tees
    - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Richard
    - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, William M. Klein
- Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Richard
  - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, mnews
    - Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, mark
- Re: REDEFINES in Micro Focus NetExpress 4, Jeff Lanam
Error, G. Ferraro
- Re: Error, Richard
  - Re: Error, G. Ferraro
Fujitsu Cobol Error- Exception in page error, mvalecruz5@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fujitsu Cobol Error- Exception in page error, Pete Dashwood
Email with attachments using IEBGENER, kathie
- Re: Email with attachments using IEBGENER, jce
Re: CompaqCobol (VMS), Don Braffitt
The Humanity, Howard Brazee
- Re: The Humanity, Peter Lacey
  - Re: The Humanity, Howard Brazee
- Re: The Humanity, James J. Gavan
- Re: The Humanity, LX-i
Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Of mice and men, Richard
  - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
  - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
  - Re: Of mice and men, Don Leahy
- Re: Of mice and men, Arnold Trembley
  - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
  - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Arnold Trembley
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, James J. Gavan
    - Re: Of mice and men, LX-i
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Mattias
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Arnold Trembley
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, James Johnson
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, JCE
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men (Thanks to all for info on Linux), Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, LX-i
    - Re: Of mice and men, LX-i
    - Re: Of mice and men, LX-i
    - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Re: Of mice and men, LX-i
    - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, LX-i
    - Re: Of mice and men, Michael Wojcik
    - Message not available
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Message not available
    - Re: Of mice and men, James J. Gavan
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, Chuck Stevens
    - Re: Of mice and men, James J. Gavan
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, El Pistolero
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, docdwarf
    - Linux and Windows - installationa and tolleratin (was: Of mice and men, William M. Klein
    - Re: Of mice and men, James J. Gavan
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Arnold Trembley
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Of mice and men, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Of mice and men, Howard Brazee
  - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Of mice and men, Richard
    - Re: Of mice and men, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Of mice and men, SkippyPB
    - Re: Of mice and men, jce
    - Re: Of mice and men, Howard Brazee
    - Re: Of mice and men, HeyBub
    - Re: Of mice and men, Donald Tees
- Re: Of mice and men, jce
Re: Micro Focus Cobol / 2 Workbench For Sale, Kelly Bert Manning
Net Express 4, mark
- Re: Net Express 4, James J. Gavan
- Re: Net Express 4, Richard
Re: IBM Help, Michael Wojcik
- Re: IBM Help, Fred Exley
Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Michael Wojcik
- OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, William M. Klein
  - Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Richard
    - Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, William M. Klein
    - Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Richard
    - Re: OT - Top-Posting, Lueko Willms
  - Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Pete Dashwood
  - Re: OT - Top-Posting (was: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Michael Wojcik
- Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Richard
  - Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Pete Dashwood
  - Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Pete Dashwood
    - Re: How to make IBM COBOL send in text in Telnet mode?, Richard
Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files, JRDuval
- Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files, Kelly Bert Manning
  - SORT - Internal vs External (was: Performance problem with a VSAM files, William M. Klein
    - Re: SORT - Internal vs External (was: Performance problem with a VSAM files, Kelly Bert Manning
- Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files, Clark F. Morris, Jr.
  - Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files, Kelly Bert Manning
    - Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files, William M. Klein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Performance problem with a VSAM files, Andreas Lerch
Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., jce
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., jce
  - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., James J. Gavan
  - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Richard
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., LX-i
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., jce
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., LX-i
  - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., jce
    - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Pete Dashwood
    - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Pete Dashwood
    - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Donald Tees
- Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Pete Dashwood
  - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Pete Dashwood
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., docdwarf
    - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Richard
    - Message not available
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Richard
- Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Richard
  - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., LX-i
    - Re: Are you as polite and diplomatic as COBOL?..., Richard
Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Joe Zitzelberger
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", jce
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", William M. Klein
    - OT or OT, that is the question., Howard Brazee
  - Re: Evolution or Creation of Programming Language Names (Was: OT - "lie" vs "error"), Joe Zitzelberger
    - Re: Evolution or Creation of Programming Language Names (Was: OT - "lie" vs "error"), William M. Klein
    - Re: Evolution or Creation of Programming Language Names (Was: OT - "lie" vs "error"), Howard Brazee
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Joe Zitzelberger
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", jce
  - Can people code only in COBOL was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Clark F. Morris, Jr.
    - Re: Can people code only in COBOL was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Frederico Fonseca
    - Re: Can people code only in COBOL was Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", jce
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", jce
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Clark F. Morris, Jr.
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", James J. Gavan
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Clark F. Morris, Jr.
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Clark F. Morris, Jr.
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", William M. Klein
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Richard
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", docdwarf
    - Message not available
    - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", docdwarf
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Pete Dashwood
    - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Richard
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Howard Brazee
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Howard Brazee
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Howard Brazee
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Chuck Stevens
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", LX-i
    - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", docdwarf
    - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Howard Brazee
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Chuck Stevens
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Rick Smith
    - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Chuck Stevens
    - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Rick Smith
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Chuck Stevens
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Sparky Spartacus
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Sparky Spartacus
- Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Sparky Spartacus
  - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", LX-i
    - Re: OT - "lie" vs "error", Howard Brazee
Re: OT - yet another OT thread, James J. Gavan
- Re: OT - yet another OT thread, jce
  - Re: OT - yet another OT thread, James J. Gavan