comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Richard
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Richard
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Bob Wolfe
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Josem
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Josem
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Josem
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Richard
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: Ubiquitous
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: VisOC and /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE
  • From: jlcaverlyca@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Richard
• Re: VisOC and /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE
  • From: Simon Tobias
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: HeyBub
• Full form of 'jj'
  • From: Praveen
• Re: Sequential File
  • From: Praveen
• Re: field encryption
  • From: Albert Richheimer
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Richard
• Re: Sequential File
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Visual Cobol
  • From: Jussi Jumppanen
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: John Simpson
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: cblkid
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: cblkid
• Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: docdwarf
• START KEY EQUAL TO
  • From: cblkid
• Re: field encryption
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: field encryption
  • From: Albert Richheimer
• Re: Sequential File
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Sequential File
  • From: Praveen
• Re: Sequential File
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Sequential File
  • From: Praveen
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• VisOC and /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE
  • From: jlcaverlyca@xxxxxxxx
• Re: field encryption
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: field encryption
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Richard
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Davide
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Alain Reymond
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Richard
• Re: field encryption
  • From: Ron
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: field encryption
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: field encryption
  • From: LX-i
• Re: field encryption
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• field encryption
  • From: janwright
• Re: Visual Cobol
  • From: Bob Iles
• Re: free reports tool
  • From: Richard
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Richard
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Richard Maher
• free reports tool
  • From: Davide
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Volker
• Re: Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Richard
• Declaration of INDEXED file
  • From: Volker
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Richard
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Visual Cobol
  • From: Harald Cordes
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Richard
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Love and Hate
  • From: epc8
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: [OT] Musings After Go-Live
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Musings After Go-Live
  • From: LX-i
• Love and Hate
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Musings After Go-Live
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Musings After Go-Live
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Musings After Go-Live
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Visual Cobol
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Musings After Go-Live
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Visual Cobol
  • From: TC
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Non numeric move to comp-3 field does not give a system completion code 0C7
  • From: David Roser
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• [OT] Musings After Go-Live
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• IBM announces Enteprrise COBOL V3R4
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• PLUG: txt2pdf 8.2
  • From: mail
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: epc8
• Re: A Group project
  • From: Tsquare21
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: Mike
• Re: Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: epc8
• Re: Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: Mike
• Re: Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: Mike
• Re: Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: epc8
• Re: Non numeric move to comp-3 field does not give a system completion code 0C7
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: OT: Religion in CLC posts WAS: Re: MF Collection Class speed
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Non numeric move to comp-3 field does not give a system completion code 0C7
  • From: David Roser
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: charles hottel
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: LX-i
• Bob Beemer webstories down
  • From: Mike
• Re: OT: Religion in CLC posts WAS: Re: MF Collection Class speed
  • From: Clark F. Morris, Jr.
• How to host COBOL applications
  • From: Matt
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: [OT] Stuff
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• [OT] Stuff
  • From: LX-i
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: charles hottel
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: charles hottel
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: charles hottel
• Re: Non numeric move to comp-3 field does not give a system completion code 0C7
  • From: Rosa Fischer
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: cics, db2, sql question
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• cics, db2, sql question
  • From: charles hottel
• Re: A Group project
  • From: Thane
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Richard
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Limits of Micro Focus Academic Programs
  • From: tmanal
• Micro Focus Visual Object COBOL
  • From: jlcaverlyca@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Limits of Micro Focus Academic Programs
  • From: Richard
• Limits of Micro Focus Academic Programs
  • From: tmanal
• Re: What is the difference between "VALUE SPACES" and "VALUE ALL SPACES" ?
  • From: Rosa Fischer
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBEDIT Ver. 3.00
  • From: aortega
• COBEDIT Ver. 3.00
  • From: aortega
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Warren Simmons
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: GLari
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: Mark Vilstrup Svanesteen
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Cobol 86
  • From: epc8
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Cobol/DB2 Question
  • From: Houman Ghahremanlou
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol 86
  • From: Richard
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• A Group project
  • From: Tsquare21
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Uses for COBOL other than Mainframe?
  • From: Matt
• Re: Killing Username on Mainframe Session
  • From: c_Wolf
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Uses for COBOL other than Mainframe?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Uses for COBOL other than Mainframe?
  • From: Matt
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Cobol/DB2 Question
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: epc8
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: HeyBub
• fujitsu cobol 4.2
  • From: Gys Els
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol tutorial
  • From: jlcaverlyca@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Cobol tutorial
  • From: GLari
• Re: Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Closed file system was Re: END-IF
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Cobol/DB2 Question
  • From: Houman Ghahremanlou
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: What is the difference between "VALUE SPACES" and "VALUE ALL SPACES" ?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: What is the difference between "VALUE SPACES" and "VALUE ALL SPACES" ?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Linking Problem
  • From: Bill Yarnall
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: What is the difference between "VALUE SPACES" and "VALUE ALL SPACES" ?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: fujitsu cobol 4.2
  • From: JH
• What is the difference between "VALUE SPACES" and "VALUE ALL SPACES" ?
  • From: dibalok
• fujitsu cobol 4.2
  • From: Gys Els
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Colonel_Buck
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Cobol/DB2 Question
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Cobol/DB2 Question
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Cobol/DB2 Question
  • From: Houman Ghahremanlou
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Simon Tobias
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: Mark Vilstrup Svanesteen
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: Mark Vilstrup Svanesteen
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Uses for COBOL other than Mainframe?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Uses for COBOL other than Mainframe?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Richard
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Russell
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Uses for COBOL other than Mainframe?
  • From: Matt
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: Ron
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Richard
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Registration of more then 1 CCITCP2 Servers
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Syntax for embedded sql
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Registration of more then 1 CCITCP2 Servers
  • From: MalhiNet
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Numeric validation
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Numeric validation revisited
  • From: Richard
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: MS COBOL 5.0
  • From: rondos
• Numeric validation revisited
  • From: klovn
• Re: Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: Numeric validation
  • From: Walter Murray
• Full stop/period on a line by itself?
  • From: Walter Murray
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: END-IF
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Numeric validation
  • From: Ron
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Richard
• Re: Supported <IBM> COBOL releases <on z/OS>
  • From: William M. Klein
• 'Vital' COBOL and ABEND Handling
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Numeric validation
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Numeric validation
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Numeric validation
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Numeric validation
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Numeric validation
  • From: Mark V. Svanesteen
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: END-IF
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: END-IF
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• END-IF
  • From: GLari
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL Watch
  • From: docdwarf
• COBOL Watch
  • From: foodman123
• jdbc connector
  • From: dalou4
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: [OT] IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Killing Username on Mainframe Session
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: [OT] IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Non numeric move to comp-3 field does not give a system completion code 0C7
  • From: Ron
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Killing Username on Mainframe Session
  • From: padair . o . ceallaigh
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can COBOL keepUp its reputation cleverly?...
  • From: LX-i
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: LX-i
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Colonel_Buck
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Colonel_Buck
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Can COBOL keepUp its reputation cleverly?...
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: Can COBOL keepUp its reputation cleverly?...
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Can COBOL keepUp its reputation cleverly?...
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Can COBOL keepUp its reputation cleverly?...
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Can COBOL keepUp its reputation cleverly?...
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Killing Username on Mainframe Session
  • From: CG
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: El Pistolero
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT - So it's Friday <G>
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: Bob Iles
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: g z2
• Killing Username on Mainframe Session
  • From: padair . o . ceallaigh
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Non numeric move to comp-3 field does not give a system completion code 0C7
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Non numeric move to comp-3 field does not give a system completion code 0C7
  • From: David Roser
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - Religion
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Disappearing data on screen
  • From: Colonel_Buck
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT - Religion
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Postive and Negative requirements (was: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: Richard
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: slade2
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• OT - So it's Friday <G>
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Andreas Lerch
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: g z2
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: HeyBub
• [OT] Laptop
  • From: LX-i
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: LX-i
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: William M. Klein
• RANDOM vs. DYNAMIC on indexed output file
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Richard
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: clvrmnky
• interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: Joel C. Ewing
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: [OT] IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Scott Peterson
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: epc8
• Re: convert from rmcobol
  • From: epc8
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: AcuCobol and DLL
  • From: sgbojo
• Re: rmcobol
  • From: epc8
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: question about dynamic array
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: question about dynamic array
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: rmcobol
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: rmcobol
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• rmcobol
  • From: Maurizio Giacobbe
• Re: question about dynamic array
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• [OT] IBM Mainframe Storage - DVD Drives?
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: question about dynamic array
  • From: Roby66
• Re: question about dynamic array
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: question about dynamic array
  • From: Roby66
• Re: question about dynamic array
  • From: Michael Mattias
• question about dynamic array
  • From: Roby66
• Re: World First Cancer Immune Booster
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: World First Cancer Immune Booster
  • From: Sparky Spartacus
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Of mice and men
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Occurs Depending Memory Use
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Dynamic memory in standard COBOL; using large data fields
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: SEARCH ALL
  • From: Michael Mattias

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(14)