Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 4 Jun 2005 15:31:06 -0400
In article <1117911602.925392.24120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Richard <riplin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Answering a question with a question, Mr Plinston, is no answer at all.
>
>Then, if you cannot work out the answer to your questions from my
>response then you do not deserve an answer at all.
When you give no answer at all, Mr Plinston, then I will accept it as your
having given no answer; to do otherwise might be manufacturing my own
responses and that is not, usually, a motivating factor in my attempts at
communications with others.
DD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Richard
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- References:
- interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Frank Swarbrick
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Richard
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: docdwarf
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Richard
- interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Prev by Date: Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Next by Date: Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Previous by thread: Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Next by thread: Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|