Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: "Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:25:45 GMT
On 5-Jun-2005, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My advice: Don't use NEXT SENTENCE.... ever. It is a stupid and unnecessary
> inclusion in the COBOL language. It is NEVER required, UNLESS you (or your
> installation) forbids the use of negated conditions.
Why is it required then?
I'm a big proponent of using the
IF (complicated condition)
CONTINUE
ELSE
...
END-IF.
construct for some conditions. In Olden Dayze, I would have used NEXT
SENTENCE, but don't need to anymore.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- References:
- interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Frank Swarbrick
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Richard
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Richard
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: docdwarf
- Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- From: Pete Dashwood
- interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - So it's Friday <G>
- Next by Date: Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Previous by thread: Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Next by thread: Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|