Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- From: cblkid@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Jun 2005 11:02:07 -0700
docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In article <1119973385.735390.239950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> <cblkid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >They supply values for PK-KEY1 and do a START on it (START filename KEY
> >IS EQUAL TO PF-KEY1). They say this works on the mainframe. In the PC
> >environment we are receiving an error (file status '23': Record not
> >found). We agree with the PC version and have asked for a mainframe
> >output to show this working.
>
> Is the record in question actually there? Can you step through a debugger
> to verify it?
>
> DD
I tried it both ways in the debugger, with a valid partial key and an
invalid partial key. In both instances the result is status '23' which
implies to me this is a partial key and since this is an EQUAL TO will
not be found. But then I feel I'm tainted. Would this be your
interpretation of the same status code?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- From: docdwarf
- Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- References:
- START KEY EQUAL TO
- From: cblkid
- Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- From: docdwarf
- START KEY EQUAL TO
- Prev by Date: Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- Next by Date: Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- Previous by thread: Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- Next by thread: Re: START KEY EQUAL TO
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
