Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragraph?
- From: "Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:05:52 GMT
On 11-Jul-2005, "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm trying to write a program that reformats the structure of a given
> COBOL program. One of the transformations I'd like to apply is to try to
> eliminate as many periods as possibles, using the END-whatever (END-IF,
> END-CALL, END-COMPUTE, etc.) constructs.
Why?
Is every statement that can use an END- clause going to have one?
> My question is, is it always possible to do this? I don't want to
> "cheat" by adding new paragraph names at the beginning of every sentence
> (which may affect PERFORM statements anyway). My theory is that yes, it is
> always possible, but I haven't been programming in COBOL for that long, so I
> wasn't sure.
It's not possible to do this when not all of the code is visible. If some of
the code comes from inaccessible copy members or from precompilers, then it
won't work.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragraph?
- Next by Date: Re: Cobol zOS 3.3 XML Generate
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragraph?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragraph?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|