Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragraph?





Pete Dashwood wrote:

Thanks guys, I appreciate you cutting me some slack :-)

On this occasion it isn't necessary. I have responded to Howard's post and what I'm saying isn't geeky, it is accepted practice in environments where they use modern techniques as a matter of course.

People who are not COBOL programmers are used to interacting with tools that allow them to assemble system functionality, in a way that someone whose whole life is COBOL could not imagine. There are 'drag and drop' tools that generate system functionality in minutes, that would take days to duplicate in COBOL. My point is that there is another world outside of procedural programming. And it is not the domain of geeks; people in the work place are encountering it in one form or another. And newcomers take it for granted.

Pete.

Way back in 1996, my employer paid for a class in Visual Basic (version 4, I believe). While I have never had occasion to use it at work, it was very interesting since I had no previous (or subsequent) exposure to GUI programming. I wasn't all that keen on writing a program by "dragging and dropping", but I was very impressed when every student in the class built a working inquiry application against an Access table in mere minutes, without writing a line of code.


It would have taken me several days to do the same task in traditional COBOL.

A few months ago I had an introductory class on Java programming. I managed to get through all the in-class assignments, but they never got as far as reading or writing a file, or even accepting user entered data from the screen. I guess that must be covered in the intermediate or advanced class.


-- http://arnold.trembley.home.att.net/  .



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is it always possible to write a COBOL program using only 1 sentence per paragraph?
    ... > Pete Dashwood wrote: ... >> whose whole life is COBOL could not imagine. ... >> procedural programming. ... While I have never had occasion to use it at work, ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Relevance of languages WAS: Re: Date Validation in COBOL
    ... Very good response from both you and Howard. ... COBOL replacing Assembler was one ... programming to the masses was a very bad move and there would have ... because COBOL controls everything and is not designed for responding ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Cobol and OO programming: the final chapter!
    ... The history of Cobol today is often modeled as an evolution in steps ... reflection of the OO programming influence, ... ideological fight for pimp standards has basically already been fought ... must assume it does give us the fittest ideology for the times. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Layers, objects, and granularity
    ... working with classes and objects in COBOL and ... from the input and output and replace them with an interface. ... Presentation layer, Business layer, and Data access ... Leaving aside the debate about OO programming versus Procedural programming, ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Parallelism between computer science and experience WAS: Re: SQL wrapper in OO cobol
    ... an OO cobol extension to wrap all the embedded sql statements? ... the database - or even that it's going to a database. ... concepts of programming theory. ... formalizing programming was not the common approach on most sites, ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)