Re: sequential file formats



epc8@xxxxxxxx wrote:

> Then dealing with the differences in record structure will be the
> *least* of your problems. Coping with the myriad ways of encoding the
> actual data is much more difficult.
>
> The easiest and most reliable way of moving data from COBOL X to COBOL
> Y is via text files in which all of the digits in a number and its sign
> (if present) are explicitly represented.

Do you have some specific examples of different ways that different
compilers encode data when writing to a sequential file? I would be
especially interested in hex dumps of the differences rather than just
a discussion. I am not doubting you, I would just like to see the
actual examples. One that I am aware of is that IBM COBOL on AIX
encodes the sign digit of COMP3 data differently than microfocus or IBM
COBOL on zOS. I dont currently have access to those compilers so I am
afraid I can not provide the hex dumps.

Theador.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: sequential file formats
    ... Your requests for "hex dumps" of files isn't getting many replies. ... "Introduction to COBOL Numeric Data Types ... Michael Mattias has created a text and graphics based introduction to COBOL ... > compilers encode data when writing to a sequential file? ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • RE: IS IBM COBOL dead or just not being upgraded for z9? Re: z9 Hardware update
    ... IBM Cobol is still going strong. ... As both a Mainframe developer and PC ... Developer I can honestly say that many solutions we design, ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
  • Re: AIX gets 64 bit COBOL but still none for Z/os ...
    ... COBOL in my 25 years of IBM COBOL development. ... after we shipped XML PARSE support (yes, ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
  • Re: COBOL abbreviated IF & message IGYPS2048-S
    ... There was a difference in the IBM Cobol and the ANS Cobol, ... IBM Cobol allow for the abbreviated IF, ANS did not. ... The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any ...
    (bit.listserv.ibm-main)
  • Re: dynamic calling statically linked moduled in IBM cobol
    ... > Is it possible to (using IBM Cobol VS II) to call submodules using ... > but statically link all of the submodules, ... If you have a number of dynamically called subroutines, ... It is interesting that some of the IBM COBOL team have said they believe ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)