comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Re: INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Chris
• INTEGER-OF-DATE
  • From: Michael
• OT: Katrina's Wrath
  • From: Chris
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Is Global Copy Possible?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Is Global Copy Possible?
  • From: Richard
• Is Global Copy Possible?
  • From: Chris
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: jce
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: LX-i
• [OT] Hurricane prep (Was: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Ik wil toegang tot de newsgroup
  • From: RH
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Radio and TV - Sort of On Topic for the OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: jce
• Re: Radio and TV - Sort of On Topic for the OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Radio and TV - Sort of On Topic for the OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: epc8
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Newsgroups
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Newsgroups
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Newsgroups
  • From: Pat Hall
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Chris
• Re: Newsgroups
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: SCREEN SECTION structure.
  • From: Lueko Willms
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Russell
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Newsgroups
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Matt
• Re: SCREEN SECTION structure.
  • From: Volker Englisch
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: SCREEN SECTION structure.
  • From: yogibear
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• acucobol-gt aix - debugging block mode screen modules?
  • From: michael . reid . mcguire
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• SCREEN SECTION structure.
  • From: John Culleton
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Lawrence Greenwald
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• OT: Traffic Signals in New Mexico
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Ian Dalziel
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: LX-i
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Lueko Willms
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Chris
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Lueko Willms
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Pat Hall
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Alistair
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: bfwd
• Re: question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Chris
• question concerning evaluate.
  • From: Pat Hall
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Ian Dalziel
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Suppress Option List
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• cobol/400
  • From: Giuseppe Tebaldi
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: Reading Mouse Location in UNIX via Emulator
  • From: Richard
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Reading Mouse Location in UNIX via Emulator
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: bfwd
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reading Mouse Location in UNIX via Emulator
  • From: Chris
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Reading Mouse Location in UNIX via Emulator
  • From: Chris
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: jce
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: bfwd
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Lueko Willms
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• education (was Re: My dream job)
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Supress Option List
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: HeyBub
• Supress Option List
  • From: bfwd
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Ik wil toegang tot de newsgroup
  • From: FDCer
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Micro Focus vs Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: ethans
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Linux disaster? (Was: COBOL FAQ *moved*)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: LX-i
• [OT] Linux disaster? (Was: COBOL FAQ *moved*)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: My dream job
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: John Culleton
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Matt
• Re: OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• OT: History of manners WAS Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: John Culleton
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Lueko Willms
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Russell
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Ron
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Ian Dalziel
• [OT] Liberal Weeny Spouting off....Was VSAM doubt
  • From: jce
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Ron
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Ken Mullins
• Re: COBOL programmers willing to learn ColdFusion?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: bfwd
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Cobol Compiler
  • From: anguel
• Cobol Compiler
  • From: anguel
• Re: VSAM doubt
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• VSAM doubt
  • From: Praveen
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Ken Mullins
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: My dream job
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Ken Mullins
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: clvrmnky
• Re: Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: My dream job
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Ken Mullins
• Re: Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: My dream job
  • From: docdwarf
• Crystal Reports and COBOL
  • From: Ken Mullins
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: john
• Re: COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: john
• Re: Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: Chris
• Re: Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: Chris
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: big numbers
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: My dream job
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL programmers willing to learn ColdFusion?
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Matt
• Re: big numbers
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: big numbers
  • From: Rick Smith
• COBOL FAQ *moved*
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: big numbers
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: Chris
• Creating a tar file from COBOL
  • From: Chris
• big numbers
  • From: Ladislau Balazsi
• COBOL and uni-SPF - migration to HP-UX
  • From: Pedro Machado
• Re: My dream job
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: My dream job
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: My dream job
  • From: docdwarf
• My dream job
  • From: Matt
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• COBOL programmers willing to learn ColdFusion?
  • From: thartle
• Re: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: jce
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Ik wil toegang tot de newsgroup
  • From: Ad Hoogendoorn
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT Humor - "You might be an <IBM> mainframer if... :-) V3.8"
  • From: Gerry Wolfe
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: jce
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Ik wil toegang tot de newsgroup
  • From: RH
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Cost of software on a couple of platforms
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Matt
• Re: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: jce
• Re: Oracle TV ad
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: icycalmca
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Matt
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Russell
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Russell
• Re: [OT] Schrodinger's Cat Straight Doped
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Richard
• [OT] Schrodinger's Cat Straight Doped
  • From: jce
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: jce
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Quantum [was: Re: Authorities]
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Will Linux on the mainframe kill COBOL?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• OT: Quantum [was: Re: Authorities]
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: Oracle TV ad
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: OT Humor - "You might be an <IBM> mainframer if... :-) V3.8"
  • From: epc8
• Oracle TV ad
  • From: Matt
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: recover data file format from pgm file ?
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• OT: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT Humor - "You might be an <IBM> mainframer if... :-) V3.8"
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: jce
• recover data file format from pgm file ?
  • From: cc
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Jeff York
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: jce
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: Richard
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Realia COBOL - how to see any file, just like Windows Explorer
  • From: Thane
• Re: Authorities
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT Humor - "You might be an <IBM> mainframer if... :-) V3.8"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• OT Humor - "You might be an <IBM> mainframer if... :-) V3.8"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: epc8
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Richard
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: Authorities
  • From: Richard
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Quirks Exception and Einstein
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Authorities
  • From: jce
• [OT] Quirks Exception and Einstein
  • From: jce
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT: Authorities
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs
  • From: Vincent Danion
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: ed
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• [OT] Hitler was Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Richard
• Re: data conversion
  • From: Richard
• Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: data conversion
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: data conversion
  • From: Richard
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Walter Murray
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• The redefines clause & comp-3
  • From: ed
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: data conversion
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: data conversion
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: data conversion
  • From: SanjayJain
• data conversion
  • From: anonimous
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: LX-i
• Re: SCREEN SECTION and ACCEPT ecxamples.
  • From: Richard
• Re: SCREEN SECTION and ACCEPT ecxamples.
  • From: john
• Re: SCREEN SECTION and ACCEPT ecxamples.
  • From: john
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Richard
• Re: SCREEN SECTION and ACCEPT ecxamples.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: john
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: john
• SCREEN SECTION and ACCEPT ecxamples.
  • From: john
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Russell
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: LX-i
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: COPY in area-B [was Re: Reviving REMARKS]
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: COPY in area-B [was Re: Reviving REMARKS]
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• MFsort on HP-UX
  • From: davidrae
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: jce
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Sha-1 on cobol2
  • From: Karlos
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Perceived dates
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Perceived dates
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Various "debuggin" tools (for IBM mainframe development)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: jce
• Re: Various "debuggin" tools (for IBM mainframe development)
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: jce
• Various "debuggin" tools (for IBM mainframe development)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: jce
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: jce
• Re: COPY in area-B [was Re: Reviving REMARKS]
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COPY in area-B [was Re: Reviving REMARKS]
  • From: Richard
• COPY in area-B [was Re: Reviving REMARKS]
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: LX-i
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: LX-i
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Wrong
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Begs the question
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Begs the question
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Begs the question
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: docdwarf
• Begs the question
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Of penguins and COBOL art.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• Re: Intertest 6.1 Problem with Cobol Optimize Parm
  • From: jce
• Re: Of penguins and COBOL art.
  • From: jce
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: jce
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: john
• Re: Intertest 6.1 Problem with Cobol Optimize Parm
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• OT: Of penguins and COBOL art.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: Richard
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Intertest 6.1 Problem with Cobol Optimize Parm
  • From: charles hottel
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: Wrong
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Reviving REMARKS
  • From: William M. Klein
• Reviving REMARKS
  • From: john
• COBOL 85 and 2002 for old timers.
  • From: john
• Re: Wrong
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Wrong
  • From: Rick Smith
• Wrong
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Cobol jobs
  • From: tarajohnsonhar
• Cobol jobs
  • From: tarajohnsonhar
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: docdwarf
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: MicroFocus Enterprise Server w/ Mainframe Transaction Option
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: jumping to COBOL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Diffence between two CICS READ ; FILE & DATASET
  • From: Praveen
• Realia COBOL - how to see any file, just like Windows Explorer
  • From: Melissa Kellom
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: jumping to COBOL
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: jce
• jumping to COBOL
  • From: j
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Shared" procedure division code
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: (IBM) LE for z/OS V1R7
  • From: Andreas Lerch
• Re: (IBM) LE for z/OS V1R7
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: (IBM) LE for z/OS V1R7
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)