Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: "Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 19:03:05 GMT
On 2-Aug-2005, docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Leaving aside that I barely know what *I* believe, let alone anyone
> >> else... assuming this to be true it begs the question: believes to be
> >> belief or believes to be fact?
> >
> >Are you using the common definition of "begs the question" or the
> >classical one?
>
> Answering a question with a question is no answer at all.
It can be, but in this case it wasn't meant to be an answer. It was meant to be
a question. And your statement of fact did not answer my question at all.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- References:
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Prev by Date: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Next by Date: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Previous by thread: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Next by thread: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Index(es):